you can't dismantle a whole social welfare system just because a few abuse it. Or you also want to get rid of tax collections because some cheat? Your line of reasoning does not make the slightest sense to begin with.
The whole US health care system as postulated by Republicans aims at "self-responsibility", meaning that employers at their own choosing provide the health care coverage for their employees the company desires. That often results in horribly bad heath care plans without dental, with low caps for surgical procedures, and the like, leaving difficult cases with tens if not hundreds of thousands in the red despite an insurance plan. Then the remaining of self-responsibility basically for Republicans reads as everyone else being able to choose for themselves whether they want to be covered or not. This is utterly hypocritical given the fact the federal government invades the private lives in hundreds of other issues. Why is gambling regulated, why you guys cannot even trade futures options (LOL), why you cannot invest in the same assets as other people in the world, why you can buy tobacco and alcohol (much worse health effects than marijuana) but the federal government (Republicans especially) are vehemently opposed to legalizing marijuana. It is disingenuous to leave the common man at his own peril, health insurance wise, while it dictates which substances an individual can consume or not. I can rent a car in the US, get hit by another idiot, and not see a penny because the government does not require insurance coverage for insured third-parties. When you look at state wide legislation you see that mostly Republicans oppose any sort of forced protection of their citizens while they happily collect alcohol and tobacco taxes. The difference in stance towards above topics between Republicans and Democrats is CRYSTAL CLEAR. You can moan and bitch as much as you want but even Republicans admit the same. Their stance is towards SELF-DETERMINATION while they at the same time INTERFERE with uncountably many other issues in private lives. How contradictory.
Dude, look at congress and senate and tell me which overwhelming majority postulates liberalized financial markets, liberalizations whenever it benefits its BIG CORP donors while they fight liberalization in areas that would not directly benefit them? The huge difference I see here is that Republicans mostly favor legislation that benefits the upper echelon while Democrats ON AVERAGE have the common man in mind. I am not sure this is even debatable.
Ah right, there is no fraud in food stamp usage. Everyone follows the laws and willingly forks over money for items they can get for free...yep, that's credible...
health care: Medicaid has been in place for the poor. Catastrophic plans for the lower middle class/self-employed, etc, etc...Collusion between the insurance industry and government is not exactly a "democratic" principle, so I fail to see your point here. Believe me, there are plenty of liberals who aren't enamored with ACA....
bursting of the bubble: as I mentioned in my last post, we can trace back the origins of the credit bubble at least to Nixon...it was going to blow up at some point, and yet now we have the roots of an even bigger catastrophe under Bernanke and Yellen...and yes Glass-Steagall was repealed under Clinton...so why continue down this road...
Like I've mentioned a half dozen times, my hatred for leftists is NOT an endorsement of the GOP...
That's the end of it...[/QUOTE]
The whole US health care system as postulated by Republicans aims at "self-responsibility", meaning that employers at their own choosing provide the health care coverage for their employees the company desires. That often results in horribly bad heath care plans without dental, with low caps for surgical procedures, and the like, leaving difficult cases with tens if not hundreds of thousands in the red despite an insurance plan. Then the remaining of self-responsibility basically for Republicans reads as everyone else being able to choose for themselves whether they want to be covered or not. This is utterly hypocritical given the fact the federal government invades the private lives in hundreds of other issues. Why is gambling regulated, why you guys cannot even trade futures options (LOL), why you cannot invest in the same assets as other people in the world, why you can buy tobacco and alcohol (much worse health effects than marijuana) but the federal government (Republicans especially) are vehemently opposed to legalizing marijuana. It is disingenuous to leave the common man at his own peril, health insurance wise, while it dictates which substances an individual can consume or not. I can rent a car in the US, get hit by another idiot, and not see a penny because the government does not require insurance coverage for insured third-parties. When you look at state wide legislation you see that mostly Republicans oppose any sort of forced protection of their citizens while they happily collect alcohol and tobacco taxes. The difference in stance towards above topics between Republicans and Democrats is CRYSTAL CLEAR. You can moan and bitch as much as you want but even Republicans admit the same. Their stance is towards SELF-DETERMINATION while they at the same time INTERFERE with uncountably many other issues in private lives. How contradictory.
Dude, look at congress and senate and tell me which overwhelming majority postulates liberalized financial markets, liberalizations whenever it benefits its BIG CORP donors while they fight liberalization in areas that would not directly benefit them? The huge difference I see here is that Republicans mostly favor legislation that benefits the upper echelon while Democrats ON AVERAGE have the common man in mind. I am not sure this is even debatable.
Ah right, there is no fraud in food stamp usage. Everyone follows the laws and willingly forks over money for items they can get for free...yep, that's credible...
health care: Medicaid has been in place for the poor. Catastrophic plans for the lower middle class/self-employed, etc, etc...Collusion between the insurance industry and government is not exactly a "democratic" principle, so I fail to see your point here. Believe me, there are plenty of liberals who aren't enamored with ACA....
bursting of the bubble: as I mentioned in my last post, we can trace back the origins of the credit bubble at least to Nixon...it was going to blow up at some point, and yet now we have the roots of an even bigger catastrophe under Bernanke and Yellen...and yes Glass-Steagall was repealed under Clinton...so why continue down this road...
Like I've mentioned a half dozen times, my hatred for leftists is NOT an endorsement of the GOP...
That's the end of it...[/QUOTE]