9-9-9

Quote from atticus:

Objective? No, it simply means that any plan wouldn't be an encumbrance. Cain is a complete fcuking train-wreck that thankfully doesn't stand a chance.

Forbes flat-tax was/is PERFECTION. This 999 garbage is pathetic.

You understand NOTHING... ON IGNORE!
 
Quote from Scataphagos:

You understand NOTHING... ON IGNORE!

omg... NOOOO!

Cain's illustrious performance while "at the helm" of Godfather's Pizza:

25rmrlc.png
 
Quote from atticus:

Stop relying on Wikipedia. He controlled restaurants in the Northeast/Philly area. 400 stores in all. BK was much smaller at the time. Stating he "took the reins" at BK is akin to stating that Evander Holyfield is the 10th greatest boxer of all time (*in Alabama).

Godfather's Pizza -- all he did was close 60% of their stores. Not exactly cutting-edge to look at the ledger and trim all cannibalizing restaurants in the red.

Had you ever eaten at or seen a Godfather's Pizza location?

I heard the guy speak; he has more brains than any of the other Republicans running. Wiki was for the moron who claimed his only relevant experience was running Godfathers.
 
Quote from DHOHHI:

I heard the guy speak; he has more brains than any of the other Republicans running. Wiki was for the moron who claimed his only relevant experience was running Godfathers.

As opposed to what? Odumbo's "community organizer" experience?
 
Quote from atticus:

999 is as retarded as the thread starter. It will obliterate consumption. Sure, you'll have a 10-15% personal savings rate but at the expense of a -10% YoY GDP the first year.

Not only will it obliterate consumption, it will promote black market sales of all goods and services, and will certainly create new illegal angles to circumvent this tax. RESULT - the 9 % consumption tax will be meager, at best, for generating revenue.
 
Further, a flat consumption tax will be a dis-favorable tax to the lower and middle classes, who as a whole, are the vast majority of this country's consumers.

Additionally, I don't hear any of these buffoons talking about putting some strings attached to corporations for getting the lower corp tax rate in their favor. Do you honestly think that a lower corporate tax will translate into more U.S. jobs ? The only way to ensure that, is to attach some strings to lowering the corp tax - you create an American job, you get rewarded with a tax credit. You create a job overseas, no credit given.

Global companies (like GE) are licking their chops at the thought of no-strings-attached lower corp tax rates. They do 60 % of their business overseas. Lower their tax rate, and they'll build more factories in Brazil, employing Brazilians. There may be some trickle-effect back to the U.S. from that, but most of the benefits go to the Brazilian economy, in this case. With no string attached, companies will continue to outsource to cheaper labor (but just at a faster rate). For companies, the ONLY bottom line is shareholders and EPS, not job creation counts. If they can build it for less elsewhere, they will. I think most of the Repub candidates are missing this point big-time.
 
Quote from hayman:

Not only will it obliterate consumption, it will promote black market sales of all goods and services, and will certainly create new illegal angles to circumvent this tax. RESULT - the 9 % consumption tax will be meager, at best, for generating revenue.

So true, but who are we to argue with a guy who ran a pizza chain into the ground.
 
Herman Cain served on the Federal Reserve of Kansas City, Cain served on its board, Cain became chairman of the Kansas City Fed

No thanks.

I want a president who will end corruption in this country and Ron Paul is the only one who is willing to take the steps to do that. Unfortunately, I don't think Ron Paul has a snowballs chance in hell to win.
 
Back
Top