9-9-9

Quote from atticus:

Objective? No, it simply means that any plan wouldn't be an encumbrance. Cain is a complete fcuking train-wreck that thankfully doesn't stand a chance.

Forbes flat-tax was/is PERFECTION. This 999 garbage is pathetic.



I would take Cain over Oduma any day of the week, and twice on Sunday. So would the majority of America!!!!!!
 
Quote from chaosclarity:

9_9_9_september_9th_2009_bumper_sticker-p128941310971555063trl0_400.jpg


Captain+Obvious.

How many 9s=10?

Or said another way, how many .9999999999999999999999s = 1?

Or said another way, how many .0000000000000000000001s = 0?
 
Quote from FireWalker:

How many 9s=10?

Or said another way, how many .9999999999999999999999s = 1?

Or said another way, how many .0000000000000000000001s = 0?

FYI, for those who believe in stupid satanic stuff...

999 upside down = 666

yippedy fucking do.

children.

ok... so some numerology.

6 + 6 + 6 = 18 = 9 in numerology.

wow. magic.
 
Obama couldn't run a lemonade stand without having the Gov't. bail him out. This country is hungry to elect 'ANYONE' but Obama!!!!!
 
Quote from FireWalker:

FYI, for those who believe in stupid satanic stuff...

999 upside down = 666

yippedy fucking do.

children.

ok... so some numerology.

6 + 6 + 6 = 18 = 9 in numerology.

wow. magic.

so now we can talk about sex.

69?

oh. that would who gets the upper-hand.
 
Quote from FireWalker:

so now we can talk about sex.

69?

oh. that would who gets the upper-hand.

FYI, for those unobservant that last post was post #690 by me. Interesting, huh? No. Bored.

This is post #691 by me, by the way.
 
Quote from FireWalker:

How many 9s=10?

Or said another way, how many .9999999999999999999999s = 1?

Or said another way, how many .0000000000000000000001s = 0?

I digressed... the above is the point.
 
Quote from HedgefunTrader2:

So you are admitting things are a mess? Wouldn't that imply that things could or should be fixed?

The mess I'm referring to is the lack of constitutional controls on federal spending and power and I've yet to see any candidate, past or present, who's talked about bringing structural change to Washington via constitutional amendment(s).

All we have today are populist messages, whether it's 9-9-9, End the Fed, or whatever else.

They divert attention from the real issues.
 
Quote from jprad:

The mess I'm referring to is the lack of constitutional controls on federal spending and power and I've yet to see any candidate, past or present, who's talked about bringing structural change to Washington via constitutional amendment(s).

All we have today are populist messages, whether it's 9-9-9, End the Fed, or whatever else.

They divert attention from the real issues.

- has Congress declared war against another country in the last 50 years? No.

- therefore, the President must evacuate all bases or be impeached.
 
Quote from jprad:

The mess..........................

They divert attention from the real issues.
election process,in the beginning we will have several candidates,in the middle we will all argue feverishly for our candidate,towards the end we will get a republican or a democrat and argue more,calling each other stupid for being a repub or dem depending on which side of stupid you are on,when it's all said and done and forgotten about for another 4 years,they will have given us 2 candidates to pick from,we will have elected yet another of the 2 parties in the past and presently robbing, mismanaging,possibly dismantling, the country...now let's divert our attention back to the real issues
 
Back
Top