Spoken like a true tow the party line, completely off the political spectrum chart, flaming liberal.Quote from bigdavediode:
Exactly. There is no right answer, and there's nothing wrong with the top 20% paying 80% if there's a great wealth disparity. 20% paying 80% has no meaning on its own and is a perfect example of abuse of statistics.
Maybe we should start referring to our federal government as "Robin Hood".
And if in fact the top 20% of earners are paying 80% of the taxes, how is that an abuse of statistics?
