ajacobson Sep 12, 2020 #1 https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-u...als-more-caution-on-tech-stocks-idUKKBN262027 There are clearly mistakes in the description of the call spreads.
https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-u...als-more-caution-on-tech-stocks-idUKKBN262027 There are clearly mistakes in the description of the call spreads.
M murray t turtle Sep 13, 2020 #2 ajacobson said: https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-u...als-more-caution-on-tech-stocks-idUKKBN262027 There are clearly mistakes in the description of the call spreads. More... %% Im watching50 dma more than that or put/call ratio; IBD newspaper always puts put call ratio under S&P 500+ I use SPY more than S+P 500 or 505...……………………………………………...
ajacobson said: https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-u...als-more-caution-on-tech-stocks-idUKKBN262027 There are clearly mistakes in the description of the call spreads. More... %% Im watching50 dma more than that or put/call ratio; IBD newspaper always puts put call ratio under S&P 500+ I use SPY more than S+P 500 or 505...……………………………………………...
