I read that his brother, who is part owner, is suing him for basically not considering the interest of the shareholders. Also a woman who was a top salesperson left because other less performing and less tenured people were making the same as her. I applaud the guy for what he did. I honestly think it was not a publicity stunt. I think there could have been a fairer way to do this than to say the new salesperson and the janitor are going to make the same as a senior salesperson. I think the gap between owners/executives and workers is way too large but that doesn't mean everybody should make the same. Perhaps giving away 50% of net profits at the end of the year based on job title, performance, and seniority would be better. That way the the receptionist making $30k can get a $10k bonus and the salesperson making $60k gets a bonus too and both are happy making higher than industry standards.