7 to 1: Trump Sex Scandals vs Hillary WikiLeaks Coverage

Tony Stark

Tony Stark

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb...mp-sex-scandals-vs-hillary-wikileaks-coverage



7 to 1: Trump Sex Scandals vs Hillary WikiLeaks Coverage

By Mike Ciandella | October 13, 2016 | 4:30 PM EDT


From Friday evening to Thursday morning, the morning and evening news shows on ABC, CBS and NBC dedicated 4 hours and 13 minutes to discussing the recent allegations of sexual misconduct surrounding Donald Trump’s campaign. Meanwhile, not only has the continual release of the WikiLeaks emails from top Hillary staff gotten a comparatively puny 36 minutes of coverage during this same time period, the coverage that is there continues to ignore specifics that could be damaging to Hillary.

Still completely absent from the network coverage? Any mention of the emails where journalists collaborated with the Clinton campaign.



Journalists quick to be critical of Trump dismissed the entirety of the email leak as a “distraction” (Nancy Cordes, CBS This Morning on October 13) with “no major bombshells” (Kasie Hunt, NBC’s Today on October 8). CBS This Morning on October 13 even invited on New York Times correspondent Mark Leibovich to talk about the leaked emails, -- a reporter who himself was featured in the leaked emails for having Hillary Clinton approve one of his stories about her. Yet not a single CBS “journalist” even mentioned this huge potential conflict of interest.

Incriminating emails that were mentioned, such as Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s comments about “needy Latinos” were only mentioned in passing. In the case of a series of anti-Catholic emails, the worst examples were ignored.

A large focus of the network news coverage of WikiLeaks has been on how the emails were hacked and leaked. This is a legitimate news topic, but if these were leaked emails from the Trump campaign, would the same effort be put into caring about how the emails were released, instead of focusing on their content?
 
The corruption between Government and "Big Business", multinational conglomerates exists as a symbiotic relationship. Power and influence are needed to gain office, those dealing said power and influence need congress to pass laws ensuring their existence and feeding their greed.

Any possibility of an outsider or threat to that relationship must be squashed, hence the multifaceted attack on Trump. From questionable at best favoritism being extended from the DOJ, FBI all coordinated via the WH, to every means available by Big Business and their affiliates, even the sell outs to the symbiotic relationship within Trump's own party are all being brought to bear. This is not about Trump anymore as it's becoming an example to those who might consider future attempts at office circumventing the "Systems" blessing.

Is Trump the best most qualified candidate? Not by a long shot. However he is not a part of the problem which has entrenched itself in both sides of our National Politics. Which is why he must be elected President if we have any chance to break this cycle.

It's not about Democrat/Republican agendas anymore, the bottom line they exist to serve the same master. All else is vocal ear candy to the steeple, appeasing them. The Nation has been so divided, with the voters so polarized they are attracted to extreme Candidates that share no similarities to their constituents, except for their repeated hollow campaign promises.

If Hillary gains office all hope of "government for the people by the people" will be lost. Hillary is the "System", She is the progeny of the corruption that exists in our Government. Under her leadership government will be grown, overreacting with its tentacles evading every aspect of our lives, feeding more and more off its people with the courts standing obediently inline stamping their approval.

Welcome to the Matrix.
 
Last edited:
The people of the United States want what the people of the Soviet Union had. But first we have to look more like Europe. Did you know that we are the only industrialized nation that is not like Europe? It's a disgrace.
oh well, at least we have the media sewn up. Those Russians. Always hacking around. But they sure could control the media. The major difference between the New York Times and Pravda is....
 
The Media are now an Official Enemy to the United States.

Every single one of those news anchor fucks is now on the enemy list as the anti-American globalist scum they are.
 
(Vanity) Is Mexico Trying to Interfere in the U.S. Election
10/14/2016, 1:58:00 AM · by TigerClaws · 9 replies
Vanity
NYT were on the brink of bankruptcy. Print media is dying and they are no exception. Their savior was Carlos Slim, a Mexican billionaire. 2nd riches man in the world. Why does someone invest in newspapers when they are losing money and dying? Power and influence. Mexican national using an old and known American newspaper to influence our election. Just shows the corruption Trump is up against.
 
fhl, Don't forget the Wash Post was purchased a couple of years ago by Jeff Bezos. I suppose that is preferable to Soros having to buy both it and the NYT himself. As long as reliable establishment liberals control them, that is all we ask for.

Of course, Bezos, whose business is mainly based on selling crap from china, would not be biased against Trump or anything.
 
Trump has always had love-hate relationship with the media, and has always sought more and more of its attention. Well, now he has it. He's reaping what he sowed.

Of course, it doesn't help that he's acting like a crazy ex.
 
Last edited:
While the msm is busy hiding every Clinton indiscretion and highlighting dubious claims against Trump, internet users are more interested in wikileaks taking an email dump on Clinton.

Q4bKrP6.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top