Just my two cents: I have to agree with Fishsauce on this one.
Looking at your website.
The scalar direction (i.e. no magnitude) of your fund is very very close the S&P 500. In other words, The direction of your fund is close to the direction of the S&p 500. Thus one would expect a very high r-squared. Your r-squared is 0.19! That's absurd.
There is NO variant of calculating alphas! I used to work for Eaton Vance and Fidelity: there's only one alpha: MPT alpha. No matter how you calculate it ... the number should be similar. Dont you agree? And as Fish wrote: MSN money's database is way way more reliable. And their number differs fomr Marketocracy by 3 folds! (3x)
Goodluck with you endeavor. Jobs and interns opportunites are rare in this day and age. I wish I can setup you up with an interview or two. But I cant as I have no leverage a this point.
Looking at your website.
The scalar direction (i.e. no magnitude) of your fund is very very close the S&P 500. In other words, The direction of your fund is close to the direction of the S&p 500. Thus one would expect a very high r-squared. Your r-squared is 0.19! That's absurd.
There is NO variant of calculating alphas! I used to work for Eaton Vance and Fidelity: there's only one alpha: MPT alpha. No matter how you calculate it ... the number should be similar. Dont you agree? And as Fish wrote: MSN money's database is way way more reliable. And their number differs fomr Marketocracy by 3 folds! (3x)
Goodluck with you endeavor. Jobs and interns opportunites are rare in this day and age. I wish I can setup you up with an interview or two. But I cant as I have no leverage a this point.
