Quote from QuantPlus:
IB obviously has a history of rejected futures orders...
Or orders that are ** not being displayed **...
Being filled at a later time.
As a futures trader doing 50-100 contracts...
You should be VERY conscious of this...
And come up with ways to deal with it.
The fact you just coincidently happened to be away at the time of the fill...
Does not help your case.
If you feel you have been screwed:
(1) Stop dealing with IB Customer Service.
(2) Hire an experienced lawyer immediately.
You will probably have to hire someone in new York or Chicago.
VERY experienced in securities arbitration is COMPULSORY.
(3) Deal ONLY with the Director of Compliance for IB...
It's easy to get his name and number.
(4) Find out who the direct NASD examiner for this is...
And send a copy of all correspondence to this NASD examiner and his boss.
There are various levels of NASD arbitration...
Before you have to resort to the US court system.
My guess is that there are serious problems with IB's software...
And if they were to lose this in arbitration...
The NASD would also fine then like $500,000 or more...
So if you handle this profesionally...
IB will settle to avoid an NASD investigation...
Which they probably do all the time.
Quote from saxon:
zzzap,
Sorry to hear about your nightmare!
Just one question: When your GBP order was "rejected", was there still an order line showing on your screen? If so, was it red or magenta?
It seems that cancelled (or rejected?) orders are not completely dead until they show a red status.
saxon
Quote from RAY:
Wow,
As most criticizem of IB is unwarranted; and you seem to have the need to immediately defend.
I decided to check this out, and read the LOG; which you obviously didn't. In my humble opinion: It is clearly apparent the situation as presented here is highly likely. The only way he is at fault is if HE had his orders set to be continually resubmitted (obviously not since the orders are so far apart). The order was clearly rejected and then when the software shut down and reloaded itself (many hours later) that order was somehow magically submitted and filled; ALL within a couple of seconds. His fingers can't be that good.
Thank you for stepping forward and bringing this to our attention. Please keep us updated as to the outcome. As I am a very Long term customer and supporter of IB; Things like this concern me GREATLY.
disclaimer: I use IB; I like IB, and I am not a software expert. So maybe I am missing something, and open to correction from the IB tech department.
Quote from QuantPlus:
One clear problem with TWS...
Is that you can have a live order...
That you cannot see via TWS.
I just had one like that execute 5 minutes ago.
In theory...
TWS does not allow you to delete a symbol with a live order...
But this is not reliable...
And there are VARIOUS circumstances...
Where orders can exist that you cannot see via TWS.
If you are making $100,000 trades in fast markets...
You cannot trust TWS alone...
Because TWS is not a professional grade platform.
NOTHING about IB is professional grade...
It's a FREAKING retail broker.
If your trades can have 5 or 6 figure losses...
Then you MUST have additional proprietary software that uses the API or a FIX connection or whatever...
And does a lot of surveillance and cross-checking of orders/executions.
Quote from QuantPlus:
One clear problem with TWS...
Is that you can have a live order...
That you cannot see via TWS.
I just had one like that execute 5 minutes ago.
If you are making $100,000 trades in fast markets...
You cannot trust TWS alone...
Because TWS is not a professional grade platform.
NOTHING about IB is professional grade...
It's a FREAKING retail broker.