It's definitely possible but not consistently in a liquid efficient market (it's possible in inefficient markets to get very consistent results, but usually those inefficiencies will disappear after a few years). Rather you will make a big profit 20% of the time, and do nothing the other 80%. If you try to make trades every day you will probably bleed money 80% of the time and wipe out the profits from the 20% of days where there's a clear edge on 1 or more trades.
My experience is that the best days in any given market have 1-3 really good setups, and most days have NO great setups. So, the way to do it is focus on lots of markets, and trade only the most busy ones that are in play, with news/events/action that will drive big up and down days. Don't try to trade the usually choppy rangy day - even if you profit, it is boring as fuck and distracts focus from the next big move.
Example - look at gold during the crash and bounce. That had plenty of action. Anyone trying to grind out ticks in the ES was an idiot when they could have been playing a $50-100 daily range in gold.
The edge from the rare great setups is so fat and skewed, that it is almost insane to trade more marginal trades. Just do nothing most of the time, wait for slam dunks, then bet a meaningful but not crazy amount on them. A good daytrade setup like a big gap & crap move after an extended one-way trend, can offer a 75%+ win rate and a 5:1 risk/reward, which is highly profitable. Even just 1 of those every month, bet at a very conservative risk of 1% of capital per trade, will make on average 72.5% return per annum. Juice the risk to a still safe 3% per trade and you get a diabolical 666% per annum, yet your risk of a >10% drawdown is only about 1 in 50 - *assuming* you are right about the trade odds.
Now, how do you find and stick to only the very best setups? That's the hard part
