50 Top Astronauts, Scientists Slam NASA For Promoting Man-Made Climate Change

Quote from jem:

Now that you finally understand the point... you have refined your argument... good. We are making progress.

Show the data which confirms your last paragraph. How can you say the increased CO2 is not being held in place because the earth is in a warming period.

You have no data which shows - "high CO2 levels due to the burning of fossil fuels is the main driver of the the rising temps."



So you know CO2 raises temps (is a greenhouse gas). You know CO2 levels are 30% higher over the last 100 years. Yet you still can't understand how these increased levels - caused by man - are leading to higher temps, which we are seeing. Can you add 2 + 2 ?

We know the increase in CO2 is from the burning of fossil fuels.

There is tons a data and analysis that the main driver of the recent warming trends is due to CO2 pollution.

In fact virtually all the climatologists, and all the world's science organizations agree.

And then there is you and your other ideologically deluded, denier friends here, who apparently are incapable of rational thought.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

So you know CO2 raises temps (is a greenhouse gas). You know CO2 levels are 30% higher over the last 100 years. Yet you still can't understand how these increased levels - caused by man - are leading to higher temps, which we are seeing. Can you add 2 + 2 ?

We know the increase in CO2 is from the burning of fossil fuels.

There is tons a data and analysis that the main driver of the recent warming trends is due to CO2 pollution.

In fact virtually all the climatologists, and all the world's science organizations agree.

And then there is you and your other ideologically deluded, denier friends here, who apparently are incapable of rational thought.

"How many times do you have to be told the data shows warming precedes the accumulation of CO2 and cooling causes it to dissipate?"
 
Quote from pspr:

What does it say about the credentials of someone with an Enviromental Science degree if they don't understand the relationship, or lack there of, of CO2 to global warming?

You are also a fucking idiot.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

"How many times do you have to be told the data shows warming precedes the accumulation of CO2 and cooling causes it to dissipate?"
I wonder if he will still be here preaching the same story when another solar minimum cools the planet.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Yeah so. It doesn't mean shit.
So the facts don't mean shit to you huh?

Newsflash futureCUNTS, that would make YOU the fucking idiot.
 
If this argument hasn't been a great example of how fucking stupid rabid righties are, I don't know what is. When faced with the most obvious science they are still unable to come to grips with it. Whether this is due to ignorance, stupidity or ideological blindness, it's truly stunning. It's like they're severely mentally handicapped.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

If this argument hasn't been a great example of how fucking stupid rabid righties are, I don't know what is. When faced with the most obvious science they are still unable to come to grips with it. Whether this is due to ignorance, stupidity or ideological blindness, it's truly stunning. It's like they're severely mentally handicapped.

"How many times do you have to be told the data shows warming precedes the accumulation of CO2 and cooling causes it to dissipate?"
 
Back
Top