41% of Americans want to abolish free speech

BSAM said:
It was a grammatical error because he used "your" instead of "you're".
It's not a matter of what he wanted.
It's a matter of what he wrote; which was incorrect.

No, no digging here.
I did great in English grammar.
More...
Wrong again. The gent in question also often uses "then" when he should be using "than." He doesn't know the difference. Both words are spelled correctly, but the question is one of intent. And he gets it wrong. It's not grammar; it's English spelling.

I have read in the past here where some of you guys wrote "panty waste," whereas the correct term is "pantywaist." Because both words "panty" and "waste" are individually not spelled incorrectly, are you going to suggest that this was a grammatical error as well?

Still digging?
 
Frederick Foresight said:
Wrong again. The gent in question also often uses "then" when he should be using "than." He doesn't know the difference. Both words are spelled correctly, but the question is one of intent. And he gets it wrong. It's not grammar; it's English spelling.

I have read in the past here where some of you guys wrote "panty waste," whereas the correct term is "pantywaist." Because both words "panty" and "waste" are individually not spelled incorrectly, are you going to suggest that this was a grammatical error as well?

Still digging?
More...
You and Ricter are stupid fucks. Neither of you have offered one cogent argument as to WHY hate crime law should be considered. Nor explain why it wouldn't apply to all of your liberal bullshit (white men bashing, christian bashing, gun owner bashing, depopulation, pro-death etc).

You're just stupid. Straight up.
 
achilles28 said:
You and Ricter are stupid fucks. Neither of you have offered one cogent argument as to WHY hate crime law should be considered. Nor explain why it wouldn't apply to all of your liberal bullshit (white men bashing, christian bashing, gun owner bashing, depopulation, pro-death etc).

You're just stupid. Straight up.
More...

They have no reasonable response.
That's why they have to create a sideshow.
That's how liberals do it.
Take Obama and Hitlery for example...
 
achilles28 said:
Pathetic...

Why dont you argue your case, instead of diverting the conservation.
More...
I try to avoid engaging with raging illiterates. There's very little upside. But thanks for asking. However, you may read my earlier posts in this very thread for clarification on where I stand on the issue. Have a great day.
 
But, I do have a question:

Which would be correct?:
(Assume the reference is to many liberals.)

A: The liberal's love for homosexuality is amazing.
B: The liberals' love for homosexuality is amazing.
C: The liberals love for homosexuality is amazing.
D: What's it matter; it's still amazing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top