.38 fibonacci level reached on the S&P

Peak Oct '07 to March '09 lows on the s&p

Do we retrace to the .5 level without a pullback?

I'm thinking not because the crash last year was so violent it would almost be asking to much (not very technical but it sounds good)
 

Attachments

Quote from ang_99:

Peak Oct '07 to March '09 lows on the s&p

Do we retrace to the .5 level without a pullback?

I'm thinking not because the crash last year was so violent it would almost be asking to much (not very technical but it sounds good)

Woo Hoo. Now we are set. Not...

Seriously, why does 1 occurrence have any relevance. Are the 500 CEOs' under the S&P looking at the .38 level, so they can in concert move their company's stocks so that the S&P does this???
 
Quote from TraderZones:

Are the 500 CEOs' under the S&P looking at the .38 level, so they can in concert move their company's stocks so that the S&P does this???


ceo's don't move stocks, traders and investors do.


fibonacci_spiral.jpg



NautilusCutawayLogarithmicSpiral.jpg


230.jpg
 
Quote from ang_99:

Peak Oct '07 to March '09 lows on the s&p

Do we retrace to the .5 level without a pullback?

I'm thinking not because the crash last year was so violent it would almost be asking to much (not very technical but it sounds good)

A pretty interesting confluence of levels- occurs around the .50 ret level with the completion of a AB=CD pattern that we are currently in.
 
Quote from stock_trad3r:

fib levels r essentially worthless
It is only as worthless as the traders trading them.

That is, if traders trading Fibs are worthy and can move the market, then Fibs will work.
 
Quote from crash n burn:

TA is non sense.

this thread is as credible as black magic.

Excerpt from Paul Tudor Jones interview, 2000:


(Short Phrase Associations)

Q: Technical analysis

Paul Tudor Jones: Made well over half the money that I've made in my lifetime.

Q: Fundamental Analysis

Paul Tudor Jones: Made the rest.
 
Quote from ang_99:

ceo's don't move stocks, traders and investors do.


fibonacci_spiral.jpg



NautilusCutawayLogarithmicSpiral.jpg


230.jpg

yes, but if you understood the question, you would not have given a response that has nothing to do with it or the answer.
 
Back
Top