1. I showed the the evidence the New York Times covered it as did the the hill. your fact check is biased garbage last time I read it.
here is the real info... and then read the hill article from a few months ago...
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...&gwh=B0F7C7CF39C2CCBF3D864CF1FA8D70C6&gwt=pay
2. I went by what I quickly read in the article. Your did not link to the indictment you mis labled the status report as indictment pdf.
if the indictment says he was laundering money while working for trump you might want to cite and explain it.
It seems to me he is being indicted for hiding money from the IRS and laundering his own money. The money he received while working with the indicted Podesta... not Trump.
I could be wrong... because I have to go now...and only scanned the indictment. So please do some work and back up your statements. You may be correct... but I would like to see you back it up.
3. I already showed you the podesta email exchange. assange highlighted it.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release
What the Clinton campaign spokesman failed to disclose, however, was the fact that a few days before sending his rebuttal to the New York Times, Jose Fernandez wrote on the evening of the 17 April 2015 to John Podesta following a phone call from Mr Podesta (Email ID 2053): "John, It was good to talk to you this afternoon, and I appreciate your taking the time to call. As I mentioned, I would like to do all I can to support Secretary Clinton, and would welcome your advice and help in steering me to the right persons in the campaign".
Five days after this email (22 April 2015), Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon wrote a memo to the New York Times, declaring that "Jose Fernandez has personally attested that 'Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter',” but Fallon failed to mention that Fernandez was hardly a neutral witness in this case, considering that he had agreed with John Podesta to play a role in the Clinton campaign.
The emails show that the contacts between John Podesta and Jose Fernandez go back to the time of internal Clinton campaign concern about the then-forthcoming book and movie "Clinton Cash" by Peter Schweizer on the financial dealings of the Clinton Foundation.
In an email dated 29 March 2015 (Email ID 2059), Jose Fernandez writes to Podesta: "Hi John, I trust you are getting a brief rest after a job well done. Thanks no doubt to your recommendation I have joined the CAP [Center for American Progress] board of trustees, which I'm finding extremely rewarding."
4. Hillary is being investigated by Congress the last time I read about it. arguing there is no investigation is not a big deal consider the FBI was working with her in paying for the dossier and probably conspired with her to defraud the United States with his FISA application.
here is the real info... and then read the hill article from a few months ago...
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...&gwh=B0F7C7CF39C2CCBF3D864CF1FA8D70C6&gwt=pay
2. I went by what I quickly read in the article. Your did not link to the indictment you mis labled the status report as indictment pdf.
if the indictment says he was laundering money while working for trump you might want to cite and explain it.
It seems to me he is being indicted for hiding money from the IRS and laundering his own money. The money he received while working with the indicted Podesta... not Trump.
I could be wrong... because I have to go now...and only scanned the indictment. So please do some work and back up your statements. You may be correct... but I would like to see you back it up.
3. I already showed you the podesta email exchange. assange highlighted it.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release
What the Clinton campaign spokesman failed to disclose, however, was the fact that a few days before sending his rebuttal to the New York Times, Jose Fernandez wrote on the evening of the 17 April 2015 to John Podesta following a phone call from Mr Podesta (Email ID 2053): "John, It was good to talk to you this afternoon, and I appreciate your taking the time to call. As I mentioned, I would like to do all I can to support Secretary Clinton, and would welcome your advice and help in steering me to the right persons in the campaign".
Five days after this email (22 April 2015), Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon wrote a memo to the New York Times, declaring that "Jose Fernandez has personally attested that 'Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter',” but Fallon failed to mention that Fernandez was hardly a neutral witness in this case, considering that he had agreed with John Podesta to play a role in the Clinton campaign.
The emails show that the contacts between John Podesta and Jose Fernandez go back to the time of internal Clinton campaign concern about the then-forthcoming book and movie "Clinton Cash" by Peter Schweizer on the financial dealings of the Clinton Foundation.
In an email dated 29 March 2015 (Email ID 2059), Jose Fernandez writes to Podesta: "Hi John, I trust you are getting a brief rest after a job well done. Thanks no doubt to your recommendation I have joined the CAP [Center for American Progress] board of trustees, which I'm finding extremely rewarding."
4. Hillary is being investigated by Congress the last time I read about it. arguing there is no investigation is not a big deal consider the FBI was working with her in paying for the dossier and probably conspired with her to defraud the United States with his FISA application.
Last edited:
