32 new charges filed against Trump campaign manager and aide. Time to flip or die in prison

I noticed that and he has so many posts in the past about Hillary's guilt without the due process he now loves. There is no point bringing up hypocrisy with Cons, they live and breathe it.

Exactly what I expect from the liberal left.
 
Exactly what I expect from the liberal left.

What does this bullshit even mean? Why do you Cons get into a tizzy and resort to your coached talking points everytime you are asked to express yourself clearly and logically.
 
Its funny you deny that the millions of dollars from Putin and his surrogates funneled to bill and hillary indicate hillary was a crook and then Putin got uranium.

yet you want to connect mannaforts crimes of taking in money before he worked for trump and then lying on bank loan apps is connected to Trump.

My view is... Trump may be guilty of something but you have shown no evidence.
Where we know Putin's team funneled millions to hillary and bills "charity" and he got uranium.
And we have emails from Podesta in which the CIFUS guy sort of extracted a promise of a job or title from Podesta what look like the quid pro quo of him saying Hillary had not influenced him.

They both don't look good. But one set is circumstantial evidence and the stuff about Trump would probably be kept out of evidence as more prejudicial than probative.

in short you did not tie anything to Trump yet. although you may... and I would not care.

So a guy laundering money and promising jobs in the WH while employed by Trump means no connection to Trump? Who said he was laundering money for Trump? Can you read?

A simple question, why was this Russian stooge hired by Trump in the first place? Not for his campaign skills obviously given he never had a reputation for it, so give it a guess.
 
Last edited:
If you were in the room with another man, I believe he would give you the back of his hand within an hour.

This is why you creep about online I expect, afraid of bruises.
 
Its funny you deny that the millions of dollars from Putin and his surrogates funneled to bill and hillary indicate hillary was a crook.


I deny it because it has no evidence for it and if there is evidence for it, where is the DOJ indictment?

https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/



yet you want to connect mannaforts crimes of taking in money before he worked for trump and then lying on bank loan apps is connected to Trump.


You may want to read the indictment, he was laundering money while working for Trump including promising jobs in exchange for millions in 'loans'

My view is... Trump may be guilty of something but you have shown no evidence.
Where we know Putin's team funneled millions to hillary and bills "charity" and he got uranium.

Who is 'we'. There is not even an investigation into that bullshit but you 'know' already but at the same time you want evidence for Trump when the investigation hasn't finished.

And we have emails from Podesta in which the CIFUS guy sort of extracted a promise of a job or title from Podesta what look like the quid pro quo of him saying Hillary had not influenced him.

'Sort of' 'promise' 'looks like'

Why not make just stuff up and call it pizzagate.

They both don't look good. But one set is circumstantial evidence and the stuff about Trump would probably be kept out of evidence as more prejudicial than probative.

in short you did not tie anything to Trump yet. although you may... and I would not care.

Except one is being investigated, there are grandjuries and indictments. Your U1 BS isn't going anywhere due to lack of evidence because it is BS as usual.
 
Back
Top