...are you going to used 4.15 EST as EOD for all participating derivatives...?Quote from HowardCohodas:
My personal preference is to have out of sample data set be on the same symbol as the in sample data set, but with randomly chosen segments for each. That removes my concern for correlation between symbols, and places multiple instances of different market conditions into each set. Since the elements of each set are randomly selected (without replacement), a large number of runs can be made and statistics measuring the consistency of results can help detect unintended curve fitting. I am somewhat of a fanatic about methods to avoid curve fitting when developing/testing strategy ideas using back testing.
I am interested in watching your results here forward for several reasons. First I wish you great success. Second, it will give me some insight into whether or not I am overly aggressive at randomizing the test data sets to avoid unintended curve fitting.
Quote from pattern39:
Just a few questions from a discretionary trader... (1) What do you mean by 'flat at the close'? (2) Will you enter the trades manually (use the robot as the alerting system)?
Quote from Now is Now:
Well...this looks like it is going to be a good thread to follow...what you have offered is very interesting and supported by "Jazzguy" understanding of NN.
Only one question...do you have a completely redundant system (desktop/laptop).?
2nd question......are you going to used 4.15 EST as EOD for all participating derivatives...?
NiN
Quote from jazzguysoca:
Forgot to ask you about your historical data: Are you back testing with 10yrs of intraday tick data, 1min bars, or ?
Also, are you trading RTH (9:30AM to 4:00PM EST) or do you include the pre-/post-market periods in your historical backtests?