This is offer from a firm where I trade, unless someone is copying the deal exactly to the T.
The contract is a new thing now - and it was a result of several events that happened. I also know that the contract applies if they teach you their style and you take the 0 commission deal.
Otherwise, I'm not going to say much but if you are an experienced trader you should be able to figure out what 30% with no commission is compared to 80% with commission.
If your net/share ratio is high - then go with a higher payout.
What I do know is that they offer higher payouts with commission - if you choose. (the commission I beleive is .3 of a share - however I may be wrong on this one).
Most importantly I know of a lot of traders who make a lot of money who would've been negative if they paid commission (myself included). But that is a specific style of trading.
However all traders should look at this simple thing and then decide:
Your Gross.
- Commissions
- ECN Fees
+ ECN Rebates
= Net
Net x YOUR PAYOUT% = CP (commissioned payout)
Then:
Your Gross
-ECN Fees
+ECN Rebates
Net x 30% = NCP (non commissioned payout)
then look whether CP>NCP
I know a lot of traders have Gross + and Net Negative because of commissions. In that case 100% of a neg. number is smaller than 1% of a positive one.
However, many good experienced traders know that their commissions are only a tiny part of their Gross - so they will go to a higher payout (Obviously). Unfortunately, I'm not one of those - but I do know a lot of those people
Its a matter of your trading ability.
But you cannot compare 30% to 80% directly without knowing how much commission are you paying.
Just plug numbers into the formula on top and you will have your answer!