You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
30 minute bar trading using Grob/Hershey method
- Thread starter Dantheman
- Start date
Quote from Dantheman:
i think i've correctly read through the level 3 information, here it is in a document
i'll post a chart of what it should look like to the best of my knowledge, later in the day.
There is a picture post of the RUN thru somewhere in ET... I just have to find it!
MAK!
this reminds me of scientology. except jack is not skimming them for $.
ok i think i did this correctly, but maybe not, the only other thing i can think of is just alternating the 30 mins...but that doesn't appear to yield any better results.
however, with this (30 min bar, then 2 15 min bars), i can't figure out how to draw the trendlines for reversing.
however, with this (30 min bar, then 2 15 min bars), i can't figure out how to draw the trendlines for reversing.
Attachments
Quote from nzbryant:
Dan and Mako -
Chicken analysed the Fed dates and did a Tradestation test. How can you criticise his work without knowing exactly what he did? To just say it is crap as it doesnt give the profits you desire and without giving a reason is not very helpful or professional or respectful.
Very simple. He said I failed to get his failing results. LOL! Of course I failed to get his backtested results since mine were positive and his negative... Thus, he concluded that I face his failing facts... I ran right through the tape for those days (ie. backtested) and got widely different results from his. As an example, on 8/9/05, he got negative something or other, In the worst case & maximum sloppiness scenario assumption, I get $237.50 per contract less comm... Clearly he backtests differently than I do. I had the next 2 iterations ready to go for him, but he he deamed that it was not worthwhile. So clearly whatever I say, is of no assistance to him... SO IT GOES! UNFORTUNATELY!
MAK!
Still searching for the post dan. Read your chart, it is different. I need to get you the link asap... I'll find it somehow.
Quote from makosgu:
Very simple. He said I failed to get his failing results. LOL! Of course I failed to get his backtested results since mine were positive and his negative... Thus, he concluded that I face his failing facts... I ran right through the tape for those days (ie. backtested) and got widely different results from his. As an example, on 8/9/05, he got negative something or other, In the worst case & maximum sloppiness scenario assumption, I get $237.50 per contract less comm... Clearly he backtests differently than I do. I had the next 2 iterations ready to go for him, but he he deamed that it was not worthwhile. So clearly whatever I say, is of no assistance to him... SO IT GOES! UNFORTUNATELY!
MAK!
Still searching for the post dan. Read your chart, it is different. I need to get you the link asap... I'll find it somehow.
Here is what I tested. If I am wrong simply point me to the area.
This is according to the #1 beginners iteration.
Attachments
Ma petite poule. Please do not harass Jack about the testability of his system. I did that for over two years. The faithful do NOT want to hear it. The miracle of Jack's loaves and fishes is that 44 rules which do not individually test with positive expectation miraculously in the aggregate make money. Oh, ye of little faith!