30,000 Dead Registered To Vote In N.C.

[LEAPup]

Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

If one follows politics regularly, a high tolerance for hypocrisy and outright lying is required. This debate over voter IDs may redefine the levels of tolerance required though.

Democrats are opposed to these laws for one of two reasons. Either significant numbers of legal voters will be prevented from voting, as they claim, or these laws will hunder efforts at vote fraud. Which is the more likely reason? Hint: which party is in bed with vote fraud specialists like ACORN? Which party controls large urban areas where vote fraud flourishes? Which party has a sordid record of winning contested elections through fraud?

And finally, which party, while claiming to be so concerned about voter suppression, has a record of trying to surpress servicemen's absentee ballots on technicalities and which has apparently failed this year to take steps to insure that such votes will be counted?

Very well put!

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

There are laws against poisoning the drinking water of a city. No one has ever actually done it though. Following the logic spouted here therefore, those laws are ridiculous and unnecessary.

It really is illustrative of the warped mindset of liberals that they can work themselves into selfrighteous hysteria over a law requiring a simple ID to vote.

Of course, arguing themselves blue in the face over it beats defending Obama's plan to enact the biggest tax increase in the history of the world.

 

[Navin Johnson]

There is no legitimate argument against requiring a photo ID to vote. If democrats really think voters will be disenfranchised, then they should help get these people a photo ID.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Quote from Navin Johnson:

There is no legitimate argument against requiring a photo ID to vote. If democrats really think voters will be disenfranchised, then they should help get these people a photo ID.

This is really all it comes down to. This "issue" is so friggen basic that sometimes I wonder if some folks like to argue simply to argue.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Navin Johnson:

There is no legitimate argument against requiring a photo ID to vote. If democrats really think voters will be disenfranchised, then they should help get these people a photo ID.

B I N G O !

 

[L-Kabong]

Quote from Tsing Tao:

Dude, do you actually read the English language much?

You stated that forging an ID is harder than forging a signature. I said that was complete stupidity to say, and that you were a tool.

I maintain my assertion on both accounts.

Of course, if you can show where I said an ID cannot be hacked, then you have a winner.

Sigh! Do I read the English language much? Yes, and I write it very well. You on the other hand, do not. Here I quote myself:

Quote from L-Kabong:

That's an absurd statement. Do you have any idea how easy it is to obtain a credible fake ID?

.......I am not against voter verification but I can't see why a legally registered voter's signature is not sufficient when indeed a signature is far more difficult to fake than is a driver's license.

Read the above quotation carefully Tsing Tao and you will realize that you did not read it carefully the first time. You behavior is embarrassing enough, I need not throw salt on your wounds.

 

[L-Kabong]

Quote from Tsing Tao:

A little behind the times, aren't we? 46 year old Crawford is the best you can do in your fantasy enticement?

She'll do fine. I don't want to ask how young you like em.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Quote from L-Kabong:

Sigh! Do I read the English language much? Yes, and I write it very well. You on the other hand, do not. Here I quote myself:



Read the above quotation carefully Tsing Tao and you will realize that you did not read it carefully the first time. You behavior is embarrassing enough, I need not throw salt on your wounds.

So, again, you're saying and committing to the statement that a signature "is far more difficult to fake than a driver's license." And you're holding to this belief?

And you think I'm the lunatic?

 

[Tsing Tao]

Quote from L-Kabong:

She'll do fine. I don't want to ask how young you like em.

You realize there's a whole bunch of real estate before 46 that is still acceptable in today's culture, don't you?

 

[L-Kabong]

Quote from Tsing Tao:

So, again, you're saying and committing to the statement that a signature "is far more difficult to fake than a driver's license." And you're holding to this belief?

And you think I'm the lunatic?

No, I think you are an idiot. The record speaks for itself. You have early onset Alzheimers or have a frontal lobe lesion.

Quote from Tsing Tao:

Dude, do you actually read the English language much?

You stated that forging an ID is harder than forging a signature. I said that was complete stupidity to say, and that you were a tool.

I maintain my assertion on both accounts.

Of course, if you can show where I said an ID cannot be hacked, then you have a winner.