2nd Debate:Obama trying to be aggressive
- Thread starter Grandluxe
- Start date
Quote from AK Forty Seven:
Intrade before CNN released their results
CBS
CNN
Lol Fox has a whole panel of Obama voters switching sides.. I don't buy that either........ I call it as I see it, Obama gave nothing new tonight, no plan to recover other than a continuation of what is ongoing.......... all he really did was attack Mittens in an attempt to look like he gives a crap about his job.
Romney killed the President on the economy, even all your MSM buds attest to that fact... that's what the election is about, the economy.
Romney was the only one with any kind of answer tonight, all Obama did was bash Mitt but no answers of his own...... Obama looking down the road 10 to 50 years is all great but we need jobs now... and that's what Romney was hitting on all night.
Spin it however you want, all I know is whats being said by those I've conversed with, when the dust settles Romney will come out ahead from tonight's exchange, that's not even touching the obvious Benghazi fallout that's sure to ensue.
Quote from LEAPup:
It's obvious this shriek piece of shit liberal bitch is throwing this to ocommunist!
This is 75% ocommunist and 25% Romney under her "moderation."
Un fucking real!!!!!!!!!
lol. . . no ooh-rahh.
.judging by the response meter here at ET, it seems like Romney has lost.
The American auto industry has come roaring back after nearly failing. The financial system came back from the brink of disaster. The stock market has soared. Corporate profits are at all time highs. Jobs losses have gone from losing over 700,000 jobs per month at the lowest of the republican rescission to gaining jobs. We are out of Iraq war and plans to be leaving Afghanistan soon. Children can no longer be denied health care coverage due to preexisting conditions.
Obama in 2012 is the obvious choice.
Well, except for the $6.5B GM lost overseas and the additional $1.6B in foreign legal liabilities over defective automobiles:
http://thelasttradition.blogspot.com/2012/10/report-gm-has-lost-65-billion-overseas.html
"Before the bailout of General Motors, it was well understood that the worldâs largest automaker was losing huge amounts of money in the US and was staying afloat thanks to stronger performance in overseas markets.
Since the bailout, however, that dynamic has been turned on its head. Thanks to a leaner manufacturing footprint, debt eliminations and steadily recovering sales, GMâs US operations have generated the lionâs share of the companyâs profit since the bailout. And now, as the rest of the world economy slows, GM is spending more and more of its taxpayer-enhanced cash pile to shore up its faltering foreign divisions. In fact, according to an analysis of GMâs SEC filings, the company is likely to incur over $6.5 billion in losses and expenditures overseas in the 2011-2014 period, not counting over $1.6b in foreign potential legal liabilities or several other incalculable expenses that could add up to billions more.
Not only are these expenses a challenge to GMâs overall financial health at a time when it also faces billion-dollar expenditures on pensions in the US, it shows the basic problem with national bailouts of global companies. Taxpayers who were told they were saving an American company are now seeing their tax dollars flowing overseas by the billions."
"...37 percent of voters polled said the president won, 30 percent awarded the victory to Romney, and 33 percent called it a tie..."
If you go by the polls Odumbo just barely won this one. But still, the Obama loons that arrogantly predicted Obama would easily mop the floor with Romney in the debates; have now officially been wrong two out of three times.
If you go by the polls Odumbo just barely won this one. But still, the Obama loons that arrogantly predicted Obama would easily mop the floor with Romney in the debates; have now officially been wrong two out of three times.