.9/3 -$3,666
balance: $30,733
Wabu,
Your recent comments about NG made me think about the different methods of technical analysis that people use. Many traders like to talk about predictive TA versus reactive TA. They usually recommend that traders employ reactive TA and I agree with that.
Instead of predicting where price will be at some time in the future, reactive TA involves responding to a specific indication on the chart that is happening right now. The response of course takes into account the recent history on the chart (the context), but the emphasis is to only go long or go short when there is a specific clear indication to do so, i.e., to react to a signal.
You mentioned that you were sure that NG was going to be going down the next day or the one after and held onto shorts even as price kept going higher and higher on the daily charts over a 2-3 day period. It seems like this was engaging in a type of predictive TA that wasn't totally wrong (the price really was extremely overextended relative to oscillators and moving averages I look at). However, on the daily and longer-term intraday charts there didn't seem to be a clear signal or trigger indicating that prices were ready for a retracement back down and they kept producing strong bullish candles again and again.
I think that a more reactive approach would generate better performance and stability than a predictive one...