Who is Trump running against in 2020?
2020 Trends
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
Yep.Thats why he went from losing by 2.8 million in 2016 to 8.6 million (and still counting) in 2018.
Yeah, and I am only 2 chicks short of a threesome, whats your point?
He got less votes than Romney in Wisconsin, Dems not voting was the only reason he managed to squeak by and Dems are not going to make the same mistake again. Everyone is fired up.
Agreed.Dems have been proving that in every election since Trump was elected.
Well they are still counting mid term votes and when done Trump will likely lose by the most votes in mid term history.Highly unlikely you get a threesome without paying for it though.
Only 3 times in the past 100 yrs has the party of the president picked up House
seats in the midterms. --Only 3 times in the past 100 yrs has the party of the president picked up Senate seats in the midterms. ----- So with regard to The House, we had a normal midterm.-----and with regard to The Senate, we had an abnormal mid term as the President's party picked up seats. ----Senate seats are much much more valuable than House seats.--- these facts along with another tidbit that 44 Republican House Members retired indicate that Democrats, at best, eeked out a victory this midterm in The House and were thoroughly destroyed in The Senate.
Only 1 times in the past did a politician collude with a foreign power to win an election and is under investigation by his own DOJ for the treason.
And Republicans retired because they were assured of their defeat. And Democrats had to defend seats in deep red states while they did great in purple states which is what the 2020 election is going to be about. No amount of lying will help him win PA, MI and Wisconsin again, write that down now.
Ron Browstein: “The sharp turn against the Republican Party by young people in the 2018 election may be only the overture to an even greater political risk for the GOP in 2020.”
“Both historical voting patterns and underlying demographic trends suggest that the biggest difference in the electorate between this election and the next one is that relatively younger voters will cast a greater share of the votes in the presidential year — perhaps a much larger share. Even with much higher than usual turnout among young voters this year, voters 45 and below are likely to increase their proportion of the total vote from just under three-in-ten this year to something closer to four-in-ten by 2020, historical trends suggest.”
“Both historical voting patterns and underlying demographic trends suggest that the biggest difference in the electorate between this election and the next one is that relatively younger voters will cast a greater share of the votes in the presidential year — perhaps a much larger share. Even with much higher than usual turnout among young voters this year, voters 45 and below are likely to increase their proportion of the total vote from just under three-in-ten this year to something closer to four-in-ten by 2020, historical trends suggest.”