2000 Mules

Here's a question. What is a non-ridiculous website to cite? Which would you accept as factual? AP/Reuters maybe?

Sorry Overnight, when you go out and say that the Hunter Biden story is Russian disinformation then a couple of weeks later Hunter Biden himself admits he is under Federal investigation, it doesnt bode well for your credibility.

The AP and Reuters are just as bad. They covered up key information right before an election and we all know exactly why they did it.

BTW, with your track record, why are you questioning anything I say?
 
Lol....lots of Assuming.....do you also ass-ume that the election was stolen.

Assuming? If evidence has to be gathered, it is not instantaneous. You're not good at critical thinking either, are you.

I have never said the election was stolen.
 
zzzzg.jpg
 
...

BTW, with your track record, why are you questioning anything I say?

Because you thought I misconstrued a kneeling situation in a fucking football game some years ago, and have chosen to be my on-forum antagonist every since. You are not a wildchild, but just a child, for holding a grudge about something YOU STARTED, and cannot find within yourself to retract.
 
Back
Top