2 "Youths" beat 89 year old WWII vet to death.

[Lucrum]

Gun control group: 'Skip Starbucks Saturday'

http://m.usatoday.com/article/news/2681203

The wife and I WILL purchase coffees from StarBucks tomorrow. (on our way to the gun range)

 

[jem]

what is a premature ejaculator?

Quote from Ricter:

So are you, and the op.

"Wonder how much coverage this one will get on NBC.... fucking cowards"

NBC is now covering it.

Max is a premature ejaculator. "My tax dollars are going to pay for this!?" and an hour later the Army says "no" (though that might change). "NBC are fucking cowards", and later they're covering the story, like Fox.

 

[Max E.]

Quote from Ricter:

So are you, and the op.

"Wonder how much coverage this one will get on NBC.... fucking cowards"

NBC is now covering it.

Max is a premature ejaculator. "My tax dollars are going to pay for this!?" and an hour later the Army says "no" (though that might change). "NBC are fucking cowards", and later they're covering the story, like Fox.

You are a moron, the thread was titled that the that CHELSEA MANNING WAS SUING for a sex change operation, hence i already knew that the army had at first said no to it, however our tax dollars will most certainly be paying for the court time and for bradley mannings lawyer, and whatever comes out of it in the end, when it is so ridiculous it shouldnt even go to court to begin with.

Now NBC covers this story once, lets see if it gets wall to wall coverage that the Trayvon Martin case got, we all know that it wont, and we all know that this was ten times as heinous of a crime. I said, "I wonder HOW MUCH coverage this will get on NBC" I didnt say "This will not be covered once by NBC"

You really are a drooling cretin, that needs to learn how to read Ricter.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Max E. Pad:

You are a moron, the thread was titled that the that CHELSEA MANNING WAS SUING for a sex change operation, hence i already knew that the army had at first said no to it, however our tax dollars will most certainly be paying for the court time and for bradley mannings lawyer, and whatever comes out of it in the end, when it is so ridiculous it shouldnt even go to court to begin with.

Now NBC covers this story once, lets see if it gets wall to wall coverage that the Trayvon Martin case got, we all know that it wont, and we all know that this was ten times as heinous of a crime. I said, "I wonder HOW MUCH coverage this will get on NBC" I didnt say "This will not be covered once by NBC"

You really are a drooling cretin, that needs to learn how to read Ricter.

+ 101

I especially liked the last sentence. Incidentally I've notice pretty much all the liberals here frequently exhibit reading comprehension deficiencies.

 

[Max E.]

Quote from Ricter:

The leftist Huffington Post has the story presented center column.

Buried down near the bottom, was that where Trayvon Martins story was buried night after night after night? Or was it the main picture repeatedly on their site? Dont bother responding, i already know the answer since i read the huffington post regularly.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from Max E. Pad:

Buried down near the bottom, was that where Trayvon Martins story was buried night after night after night? Or was it the main picture repeatedly on their site? Dont bother responding, i already know the answer since i read the huffington post regularly.

There's a lot less controversy to this story.

 

[ogarbitrage]

Quote from Ricter:

There's a lot less controversy to this story.

Yea, that was self defense and this was bored youth killing an innocent jogger.

 

[PiggyBank]

Quote from Ricter:

There's a lot less controversy to this story.

It has FAR MORE potential to be racially motivated though, doesn't it? Just like the baseball player. That is the underlying point which you are pretending doesn't exist. All of these black on white crimes are portrayed as nothing out of the ordinary by the media (or just not portrayed), but one instance where a black kid was shot dead by a 'white hispanic' is an outrage beyond measure. Which turned out during trial to have no basis at all on race and wasn't even a crime, but self defense. The police, whose job it is to investigate what happened, had already determined based on the evidence that zimmerman didn't commit a crime, the controversy was FABRICATED by the media.

Why bother trying to diminish the hypocrisy, it can't be done.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from PiggyBank:

...Why bother trying to diminish the hypocrisy, it can't be done.

Seriously? It's what rectum does.

 

[Max E.]

Quote from Ricter:

There's a lot less controversy to this story.

The only reason the other story was more controversial was because the media decided to make it more controversial. YOU ARE MAKING MY CASE FOR ME.

It turns out the cops who decided not to arrest zimmerman acted exactly right, as their was not enough evidence to charge him. There was zero evidence that zimmerman did it based on race, infact all the evidence pointed to the fact that zimmerman actually liked black people, and went out of his way to help them.

And in that case two people got into a fight which at worst you could say was mutually agreed upon and one ended up dead.

In this case, two bored black kids decide to beat an 89 year old world war 2 vet to death, which as far as we can tell up until this point was completely unprovoked.

Are you actually going to tell me that the second case is less controversial? Can you keep a straight face while you say that?