17 women have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct. It’s time to revisit those stories

gwb-trading said:
FIRST: A DISCLAIMER - I HAVE POSTED TEXT FROM THIS ARTICLE. POSTING THE TEXT DOES NOT MEAN I AGREE WITH OR PERSONALLY ASSERT ANY WORDS IN THE CONTENT OF THE ARTICLE. THIS DISCLAIMER APPLIES TO TEXT FROM ALL PREVIOUS ARTICLES I POSTED. THIS DISCLAIMER HAS BEEN PUT IN PLACE DUE TO exGOPer's POOR BEHAVIOR AND ABUSE.

I am polite enough to other posters to spend the time to cut/paste the first few paragraphs of an article so other readers can determine if they desire to go to the link and read the entire article (with a "More at above url" indicator at the bottom).


"Cocks deny pussy grabber" <--- Hint -- this is my take on another possible humorous title for the article (it is not an assertion regarding the content or my necessarily my personal opinion). This explanation is here for exGOPer.

President Trump to honor NCAA teams Friday; Gamecocks say no to invite
http://www.espn.com/womens-college-...lina-gamecocks-decline-invitation-white-house

While the White House said President Donald Trump will host collegiate sports championship teams Friday in Washington, the South Carolina women's basketball team will not be among them.

Gamecocks coach Dawn Staley said Thursday that her team has declined an invitation and instead will focus on the season ahead.

(More at above url)
More...

No need to ham things up

This is the thread we are talking about


https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...bal-warming-is-fabricated-study-finds.311099/

Not only did you post that link along with the bolded title, you also posted this

gwb-trading said:
So in summary - try as they might to discredit the paper the climate alarmists can find no grounds to dispute the information.

Glad we cleared this up.
More...

You believed and claimed that the paper was real, it wasn't that you were simply posting information for everyone else to judge.

Holding people accountable to their own words is abuse now?

You kept claiming I don't read your links, I reminded you that if that was the case, how would I have found out that the entire claim made in Breitbart was fake? Even Breitbart who have budget in millions couldn't discern a fake peer reviewed paper from a real one but I did it and that should not be pointed out?
 
exGOPer said:
No need to ham things up

This is the thread we are talking about


https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...bal-warming-is-fabricated-study-finds.311099/

Not only did you post that link along with the bolded title, you also posted this



You believed and claimed that the paper was real, it wasn't that you were simply posting information for everyone else to judge.

Holding people accountable to their own words is abuse now?

You kept claiming I don't read your links, I reminded you that if that was the case, how would I have found out that the entire claim made in Breitbart was fake? Even Breitbart who have budget in millions couldn't discern a fake peer reviewed paper from a real one but I did it and that should not be pointed out?
More...

Still continuing your fabricated abuse, eh?
 
exGOPer said:
The part I quoted, you were not quoting the article, you were defending it with your own words.
More...

So you have provided no facts demonstrating the scientific information in the paper is incorrect. Glad that is obviously clear to everyone.

So where is your proof showing that I personally asserted the paper was peer reviewed. But you will continue onward making this claim -- just to be abusive.

It is time that you stopped abusing others in this forum and demonstrate some basic internet etiquette in your interaction with others.
 
gwb-trading said:
So you have provided no facts demonstrating the scientific information in the paper is incorrect. Glad that is obviously clear to everyone.

So where is your proof showing that I personally asserted the paper was peer reviewed. But you will continue onward making this claim -- just to be abusive.

It is time that you stopped abusing others in this forum and demonstrate some basic internet etiquette in your interaction with others.
More...

It's a fake paper, not even the scientists mentioned in that paper are posting it on their sites, why would I waste my time peer reviewing some fake paper posted on Breitbart?

My proof is your post, did you or did you not make a post under your name which said the paper was peer reviewed?

Should I post a screenshot?

Holding others to their own words is not abusing anyone, stop being a drama queen. If I was abusing you, I would be throwing insults like your friend jem does who at least acknowledged his error on that article.
 
exGOPer said:
It's a fake paper, not even the scientists mentioned in that paper are posting it on their sites, why would I waste my time peer reviewing some fake paper posted on Breitbart?

My proof is your post, did you or did you not make a post under your name which said the paper was peer reviewed?

Should I post a screenshot?

Holding others to their own words is not abusing anyone, stop being a drama queen. If I was abusing you, I would be throwing insults like your friend jem does who at least acknowledged his error on that article.
More...

Obviously you have not learned anything about controlling your abusive behavior. I will continue to post my disclaimer with every article until you learn the difference between quoted text and personal opinion.
 
gwb-trading said:
Obviously you have not learned anything about controlling your abusive behavior. I will continue to post my disclaimer with every article until you learn the difference between quoted text and personal opinion.
More...

Do as you wish, nobody is stopping you. I will continue to hold people accountable for their words and actions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top