Seattle has a disproportionately large homeless population relative to many other large cities because of Leftist policies. Whether Leftists policies create homelessness or the homeless are attracted to Leftist policies, there may be basis for some debate. Taxpayers can be adversely affected when city councils downgrade zoning laws to provide subsidized multifamily housing in established communities of single family homes, potentially causing sub-performing real estate values, increased traffic loads, and worse crime rates. In addition, a physical gerrymandering may be possible depending on district lines and party affiliations. Further, there seems to be coordination between national Democratic leadership and local Democratic leadership as appears to be evidenced by similar zoning moves in Kirkland, WA, Portland, OR, and Austin, TX.
As far as linking the increased minimum wage to homelessness, sure it’s hard to prove specific examples. However, $15.00 per hour times 20 hours per week for those not living at home usually will mean an alternative living arraignment in a high cost of living area such as Seattle, which in some cases will include at least intermittent or temporary homelessness. As a former security guard at a California technology company, I have seen temporary homelessness first hand as there was an employee who used to sleep near company property under a culvert. Incidentally, he later became a manager.
At the core of the homeless situation is whether one political philosophy is better than another, which I tried to address in an other than concise way in my previous post.