13 Russian nationals indicted for interfering in US elections

Mueller is the fraud

WHY MUELLER DIDN’T INDICT THE RUSSIANS FOR MEDDLING IN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION


The russia 13 indictiment:
"Its very first paragraph recites that it is against the law for foreign nationals to spend money to influence US elections, or for agents of foreign countries to engage in political activities without registering. But no one is charged with these crimes. Instead, the indictment is devoted mostly to charging a “conspiracy to defraud the United States.” Normally, that would refer to defrauding the U.S. out of, say, $10,000 in Medicare benefits. Its application to the 2016 election seems dubious. Beyond that, the indictment charges relatively minor offenses: bank fraud (opening accounts in false names) and identity theft."
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archiv...source=facebook&utm_medium=sw&utm_campaign=sw


Take your pick:

1. the russians didn't meddle in the election and that's why he didn't indict them under those charges, or

2. they did, but he had to use different charges because he'd have to indict hillary and steele also for this crime, and...they....can't....have....that
 
The boys have some kind of rose tinted glasses on that makes literal foreign espionage look just fine. This is just the Patriots vs the Falcons or whichever, literally not more advanced in their heads than deflate-gate.

Worse, they think the left are passionate Hillary supporters because in their mind she is the opposite to their Donny. The left had an analagous looney fringe in extreme Bernie Bros though Bernie was ok. Hillary? Most were just yeah, ok she will do I guess.

President Donald Trump's national security adviser said Saturday there was "incontrovertible" evidence of a Russian plot to disrupt the 2016 U.S. election, a blunt statement that shows how significantly the new criminal charges leveled by an American investigator have upended the political debate over his inquiry.

"The statement by H.R. McMaster at the Munich Security Conference stood in stark contrast to Trump's oft repeated claim that Russian interference in his election victory was a hoax.

"As you can see with the FBI indictment, the evidence is now really incontrovertible and available in the public domain," McMaster told a Russian delegate to the conference.

The detailed document presented the most compelling public evidence to date that the Russian operation was elaborate, expensive and real. Citing emails and conversations by the perpetrators of the plot, it also demonstrated that the ongoing probe may have access to explosive intelligence material gathered on the Russian operations.

McMaster also noted that special counsel Robert Mueller's team had shown that the U.S. was becoming "more and more adept at tracing the origins of this espionage and subversion."

Just minutes before, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov had dismissed the indictment as "just blabber."

"I have no response," Lavrov said when asked for comment on the allegations. "You can publish anything, and we see those indictments multiplying, the statements multiplying."

But Lavrov did not say what he specifically disputed in the indictment."

.........

GOOD BIT :)

"McMaster also scoffed at the suggestion that the U.S. would work with Russia on cyber security issues.

"I'm surprised there are any Russian cyber experts available based on how active most of them have been undermining our democracies in the West," he said to laughter. "So I would just say that we would love to have a cyber dialogue when Russia is sincere.""


http://abcnews.go.com/International...cted-election-probe-us-justice-sided-53160947
 
Last edited:
Slartibartfast said:
So how will FHL spin this that McMaster is an idiot and FHL knows better..
More...
Who knows how. We just know he will.

images
 
Slartibartfast said:
Trading in general and especially the politics section are magnets for such afflicted.
More...
My hypothesis is that there is a common thread running among a sizable minority of traders and those expecting to get rich quick at the Dog Track -- you can also find them betting on the ponies too -- quite serious in their quest to strike it rich. Were I a psychologist interested in studying Dunning Kruger I'd hang out at the Dog Track and in the politics Forum on ET.
 
Last edited:
piezoe said:
My hypothesis is that there is a common thread running among a large minority of traders and those expecting to get rich quick at the Dog Track -- you can also find them betting on the ponies too -- quite serious in their quest to strike it rich.
More...

I have a great idea, we Photoshop an infinity pool into a horsetrack, use ! a lot and larger fonts.. To win at the ponies, one must first become a horse's ass!! (haha).

Or the guys like FHL who are "real traders" because they know everything (familiar with the words anyway) from doing it forever but still have never made enough money in a short time to make some serious trades and reach their number. Easy to understand how they can dismiss Trump going broke owning casinos (and only surviving as long because of money laundering).
 
There is only one party/one presidential candidate that colluded with Russians in the 2016 election. Treason charges coming up if we have a real justice system in this country.
 
Time to call out fartfast for his moronic rants and foreskin and pissoe for being stupid enough to be his fans....


Here's what Mcmaster said:

"As you can see with the FBI indictment, the evidence is now really incontrovertible and available in the public domain," McMaster told a Russian delegate to the conference."



My question. Did Mcmaster read the indictment? I've already posted the fraudulent nature of the indictment. I'll post it again.

The russia 13 indictiment:
"Its very first paragraph recites that it is against the law for foreign nationals to spend money to influence US elections, or for agents of foreign countries to engage in political activities without registering. But no one is charged with these crimes. Instead, the indictment is devoted mostly to charging a “conspiracy to defraud the United States.” Normally, that would refer to defrauding the U.S. out of, say, $10,000 in Medicare benefits. Its application to the 2016 election seems dubious. Beyond that, the indictment charges relatively minor offenses: bank fraud (opening accounts in false names) and identity theft."
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archiv...source=facebook&utm_medium=sw&utm_campaign=sw

The Mule explains that it's against the law to influence elections and he explains how it's illegal. There are specific codes that these charges he laid out encompass. The Mule did not use these charges. Instead he charged them with other codes. Not the ones he just described. Like bank fraud, for instance.

Now if they broke the laws he spoke of in the first paragraph, then why didn't he charge thenm with those crimes? I guess you have to be smarter than the average leftard to ask that question of yourself.


And contrary to fartfast's presumption, I never said russians didn't meddle in the election. Of course we know they did.

Russians worked with Steele and Hillary Clinton and the DOJ and the FBI to meddle in the election. And that's a fact.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top