Quote from DirkDigler:
The fact remains there were ZERO, ZILCH, NONE, NADA "Benghazi's" under Bush. I realize you don't understand the significance of Benghazi and sadly I don't have the time to try to explain it to you.
I'm not here to play the "my president is better than your president because..." game. I just feel the need to jump in when I see such blatantly distorted facts posted. But I'll leave you with this. There have been at least four deadly attacks on US interests since Obama took office, including Benghazi. No one (R or D) seems to care about the other three. Why do you think that is? I'll give you a hint, it's not that they don't care it's that Benghazi has several (at least) distinguishing characteristics that make it much more significant. It's not that hard to figure out, you should try.