12 Reasons to Question the Veracity of Kavanaugh's Accuser
- Thread starter Poindexter
- Start date
I see. Thanks for posting.
Traders, live traders, can smell something wrong a mile off very often. Too-good-to-be-true is the trap the market lays for retail traders every minute of the day.
You should try trading futures, it would be good brain training.
And sometimes the obvious is the reality. The difference between the two is a trained mind.
The problem here is republicans are cowards. These fevered allegations of "attempted rape", etc are extravagantly over-the-top characterizations of a bit of drunken grab-ass among some privileged teens. Even this courageous victim admitted she was shit-faced drunk and had only a vague recollection of the evening.
These allegations may have been relevant in the high school homecoming king election. That's about it though. But leave it to the republicans, just like they did with Clarence Thomas to buy the democrats' premise, that this could be disqualifying, hook line and sinker. Having done so, they can't very well move on. But there is no way to prove or disprove what she has alleged. The dems are just stalling for time, either to dig up another opportunist, or to get it past the midterms.
These allegations may have been relevant in the high school homecoming king election. That's about it though. But leave it to the republicans, just like they did with Clarence Thomas to buy the democrats' premise, that this could be disqualifying, hook line and sinker. Having done so, they can't very well move on. But there is no way to prove or disprove what she has alleged. The dems are just stalling for time, either to dig up another opportunist, or to get it past the midterms.
It is still out there. Not totally deleted as she thinks. The fact that she deleted her past comments would lead one to believe she said some pretty offensive things which probably, will offend most people! Now, she is acting all pure and clean to try and tarnish Judge Kavanaugh. I hope someone who is a patriot who works for that social media firm exposes what she posted in the past! It is more relevant now that she has made serious accusations that can destroy the reputation and career of a top judge no less!
#crazycuntsonparade is more appropriate
This is obviously another Mueller type attack on conservatives.
Delay confirmation, the lady should be allowed to testify under oath. Love to see it.
Delay confirmation, the lady should be allowed to testify under oath. Love to see it.
There may be a way to retrieve her social media posts that she deleted. Since, she thrust herself in the public domain, I would think her records can now be subpoenaed under the Freedom of Information Act. I will contact and ask Judicial Watch to see if they can subpoena her social media records. Then, the Social media company will have to retrieve it and fork it over! Then, we can see all the things she has posted publicly in the past!
Hahahahahahahahahaha! Even a broken clock is right twice a day. You've shown repeatedly that anything not agreeing with your demented prejudices just won't compute -- the clear and unmistakable sign of an inferior mind.