1000% Implied Volatility In GameStop

GameStop (GME) was nuts yesterday. The major brokerages had severely limited retail’s ability to trade and the short hedge funds had the upper hand driving the stock down from near $500 to $150. Implied volatility in the options soared to levels I have never seen in my 30 year history of tracking options, and the actual volatility was like nothing I have ever seen either.

I never thought I would buy an option trading at a 1000% implied volatility but that is what I did, closing out my last position, a call spread, one option at a time.

Even though I had a relatively low risk position, I wanted to get out before expiration. Many unwitting options traders do not understand that even though their options expired and in a spread canceled the positions in the exercised stock, the long options holders can choose to exercise or not exercise an option thereby creating a stock position that was unexpected by the short option contract holder.

What does 1000% implied volatility mean in layman’s terms?

The current stock price plus and minus the implied volatility percent represents the one standard deviation range for one year. In other words, there is a 68% chance the stock will be between the current stock price plus and minus the IV times the stock price.

But what if you want to determine the IV range for less than a year?

Here’s a formula, called the rule of 16 by traders:

(Stock Price * implied volatility * square root of business days to expiration ) / 16

Yesterday, the average implied volatility for the Russell 2000 stocks was 70%. If you want to find the 20 business day, one standard deviation move for a $100 stock it would be:

($300 * 70% * sqrt(20)) / 16 = $58.70

There is a 68% chance that in a month the stock will be between $300 +- 58.70.

For GME, the options were priced with an implied of 1000%

($300 * 1000% * sqrt(20)) / 16 = $838.53

There was a 68% chance that GME would end up between $0 and $1138.53!

How can that be possible for an implied volatility to be greater than 100% since a stock can not go below zero?

The implied volatility depends on the Black-Scholes formula that has a normal distribution assumption. A normal distribution does not account for the fact that a stock can not go below zero.

Historical volatility measures the movement in the stock. ORATS calculates a special Parkinson model of volatility that can produce a one day historical volatility. What was the HV yesterday? Are you sitting down? The one day volatility yesterday was 1500%.

pP4zxm6cOR28mEVIAOX8jZneoV2gkLzjIehLIjegA3-2Y28Sfd9EKCq0PI3pAC-LlMDWRNGLqmQVNVr2TfHznd20xq8Hb-1YTsH3u3OfwF9-6f1LQeGLnfe_V1XEe2bqr2ivrnTM


It is important for traders to realize that implied volatilities and historical volatilities are just a heuristics and that the real world can and does behave quite differently than the models might suggest.

More articles...

But this is way too exaggerated though. Stocks rarely move by 1 std deviation and even according to an index.
 
I sold some $10 puts on GME expiring in April for $1 / contract just to have some skin in the game. It later went to $1.75 / contract. What's crazy is why GME has not offered more shares. They think the price will go higher? They should be issuing shares like AMC...make some of these gains permanent and improve their financial situation.

They have no reason to. If they are in the interest of raising capital, the high price that they are fetching per share is more than enough.
 
Don't want to search hard...Did two Googles, couldn't find it. How many new shares has GameStop been authorized to sell on the open market. Could that save the company??
 
They have no reason to. If they are in the interest of raising capital, the high price that they are fetching per share is more than enough.

https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/01/29/should-gamestop-help-the-shorts-and-issue-more-sto/

The high share price won't last. Eventually the bubble will collapse. It's possible if not likely that those who were short have already covered and moved on. Gamestop should simply lock in the gains that they already have. I don't know the mechanics of how capital raise would work, but apparently Tesla did something similar during one of its short squeezes a couple years ago. If GME had more cash on hand, that would improve their odds of survival for long(er) term.
 
https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/01/29/should-gamestop-help-the-shorts-and-issue-more-sto/

The high share price won't last. Eventually the bubble will collapse. It's possible if not likely that those who were short have already covered and moved on. Gamestop should simply lock in the gains that they already have. I don't know the mechanics of how capital raise would work, but apparently Tesla did something similar during one of its short squeezes a couple years ago. If GME had more cash on hand, that would improve their odds of survival for long(er) term.

If you think this is a bubble then issuing more shares would not make a difference and would make the "bubble" even worse. Why bother? I agree that Gamestop should use this opportunity to lock in the gains and raise some capital right now to revamp their business to adapt to the current trends and survive or even prosper.
 
https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/01/29/should-gamestop-help-the-shorts-and-issue-more-sto/

The high share price won't last. Eventually the bubble will collapse. It's possible if not likely that those who were short have already covered and moved on. Gamestop should simply lock in the gains that they already have. I don't know the mechanics of how capital raise would work, but apparently Tesla did something similar during one of its short squeezes a couple years ago. If GME had more cash on hand, that would improve their odds of survival for long(er) term.

Yeah, but I am wondering how many new shares are ALREADY authorized to be issued?? And how many of these new shares are in the market right now?? With all the noise over the past few days, I heard something about authorized new issues from months ago. Those are the ones I am wondering about...

PS When are stock grants made to management?? Usually with grants, they can only sell a limited amount at a time...
 
I sold some $10 puts on GME expiring in April for $1 / contract just to have some skin in the game. It later went to $1.75 / contract. What's crazy is why GME has not offered more shares. They think the price will go higher? They should be issuing shares like AMC...make some of these gains permanent and improve their financial situation.
That's what I was thinking. HTZ did it when that squeeze happened
 
If you think this is a bubble then issuing more shares would not make a difference and would make the "bubble" even worse. Why bother? I agree that Gamestop should use this opportunity to lock in the gains and raise some capital right now to revamp their business to adapt to the current trends and survive or even prosper.

So you think a company that is continuing with archaic model of brick and mortar seller of cassettes and diskettes can revamp it's business model to do what?

Sony/MS/Nintendo don't need Gamestop at all. It is 2021. Digital distribution is 80% of the market.
Gamestop has the following:
Leases (Costs)
No real estate (No assets)
Old consoles to resell at 30% mark up (Depreciating assets)
Fixtures (Depreciating assets, already at 0)
Console Games on <COUGH>DISKETTE</COUGH> (Someday worth a couple of bucks)
Stream of clients (Not going to store, COVID19, Digital Downloads, Declining YOY)
Customer List (Asset, but Sony/MS/Nintendo have the same and better courtesy of Gamestop)

They do have cash, all hopes are real that it is actually there after cancelling leases, etc.
All they were is a middleman between two willing parties, the margins have dropped, the utility of a store has dropped by more. Both willing parties can deal directly now and have an immediate feedback between each other, without visiting a 1500 Sq Ft store manned by two they/them telling you about the awesomeness of anime.

This is alas Blockbuster, Hollywood Video (Sorry from Seattle), etc.... They are all dead. This is a Cash value as a company with no future I.e. $4 a share. MS/Sony don't even want to buy them as they are not a utility in any distribution channel in the next 36 months.

You think GME can do cloud game delivery? It's already there direct from manufacturers. When HL2 came out on steam first it was obvious GME is done. You think they can make a diskette more valuable to a generation of instant download folks that have killed VHS,DVD,Blue Ray?
 
Back
Top