Hello Hardison,
52 days and no losses. Great work on your trading edge. Love it and please continue.
100% winning rate of 10000 deals in 100 days
- Thread starter Hardison
- Start date
52 days and no losses. Great work on your trading edge. Love it and please continue.
It is just an excel. There is no hard proof that it is real. Funny that depending on who is posting, the exact same "proof" is judged completely opposite.
Depending on who is posting it can be BS or very impressive. ROFLMAO.
On top of that these excels are useless, just taking place on the HD from ET.
If he were to run the same system with a "proper risk management" regime that would satisfy you through a back test it may very well be an abysmal failure.
Risk management has three components: Amount at Risk, expected profit, and probability of profit/loss.
Most, like you, focus only on the first two. Without the third, no risk management can be deemed "proper." The closer a game of chance comes to 100% favorable outcomes, the more one can risk per attempt relative to the expected reward and remain profitable.
An oxymoron if ever there was one.
It's called math.
Maybe I am confused by everyone responses.
Why so many people seem upset that the OP is posting his trades and 100% win rate?
Is this not a good thing? A trader who has 52 days of winning all his/her trade? We should be wishing him luck to get 1000 days of winning.
I often get very confused by some of the ET members responses sometimes.
Seriously, Is everyone here to make million dollars very quickly? (quickly meaning less than 2 years) That is the ONLY reason I am here.
Why so many people seem upset that the OP is posting his trades and 100% win rate?
Is this not a good thing? A trader who has 52 days of winning all his/her trade? We should be wishing him luck to get 1000 days of winning.
I often get very confused by some of the ET members responses sometimes.
Seriously, Is everyone here to make million dollars very quickly? (quickly meaning less than 2 years) That is the ONLY reason I am here.
If he never closes a losing trade, obviously the probability will be 100%, but at the same time it's a fake stat since you are holding massive DD and the probability will most likely become negative once he closes those massive DD holdings
.Why don't you try it for yourself ... Calculate the profits he made from that futures statement he showed and compare it to the open DD he accidentally showed ...
. I'll give you a hint, there isn't any profit left.To use your own words: "It's called math" and math clearly shows it's fake.
Funny how you say "most like me only focus on the first 2", while OP is hiding stats to do a propper calculation of POP ...
Thanks for showing how naive you are, now i know how much i should(n't) value your responses.
Last edited:
Maybe you should have read the comments then, he is hiding his open trades which hold a massive draw down. It's all fake.
He posted a futures statement a few pages back were you can see he closed all his positions with just 1 point, but was holding over $1800 in draw down, if he would close those he would have netted a massive loss.
Can you explain why that's your conclusion?