100% winning rate of 10000 deals in 100 days

There are soybean meal futures (ZM) at the CME, but they are very thin. Back during my early days of studying in the grains area, ZM seemed less of an opportunity than the straight-up beans, ZS. Maybe the China exchange of soy meal has better liquidity? *shrugs*.
According to the statistics of the Futures Industry Association (FIA), in 2021, China accounted for 16 of the top 20 agricultural futures in the global trading volume. Among them, the soybean meal futures variety of China Dalian Commodity Exchange (DCE) ranked first in the global agricultural futures trading volume.:sneaky:
 
No, sir, that is the exact opposite of how it works.

When accused of a crime, the burden of proof is on the state, i.e. the one making the accusation of wrong-doing. That is how rational thinking works lol

No, that's nit-wit nonsense. We're not in a court of law, we're on a trading forum.
We don't have to pretend that some unknown rando has developed the best trading system ever, just because he's obviously tweaked some data to only show the good parts.

We as free men, are free to say he's full of it.

When accused of fraud on an internet bulletin board, the burden of proof is on the one leveling the accusation.

The reason is that is almost impossible to prove one didn't commit the offense, i.e. effectively being asked to prove the negative. That is why the state must prove a crime beyond reasonable doubt.

We're not arresting him. (eyeroll) And I'm pretty sure this isn't your bulletin board to set rules on.
In normal society, not populated by fools, when someone comes up with a claim that they developed something awesome, the burden of proof is on them. This goes triple for random anonymous strangers on the internet.
Serious people, won't take such claims as meaningful unless accompanied by highly convincing proof.
If that proof is obviously shaky, that burden doesn't shift to the people who can see the bs.
 
We don't have to pretend that some unknown rando has developed the best trading system ever, just because he's obviously tweaked some data to only show the good parts.
I didn't say that.:banghead:I just want to say that anyone can achieve a 100% victory rate like me, but the core issue is whether risk control management and strict discipline can be achieved?;)
 
On the premise that the account does not break out, will you continue to make 10000, 100000, or even 1 million transactions?:cool::strong:
 
44.png

Day 44:finger:
 
Back
Top