100% winning rate of 10000 deals in 100 days

[p0box4]

OP is claiming SWAP is interest earned while it's actually interest paid !

View attachment 301316

Swap can be both paid and earned, depending on the position.

 

[p0box4]

He is showing all these consecutive trading on entry (time stamp and price) and exit (time stamp and price), what is the lying you are accusing him about?

Again, take another look, he is not ...

 

[wmwmw]

Cause when you trade cent account cfds/retail forex, you trade with bucket shop brokers based in third world shit holes (yea i said it...)

I think this is scalable to maybe $500 account max before the broker will pull the plug on him. Broker offer these shitty cent accounts with ridiculous leverage, so they attract the peasants. Once his account grows too big, they slap him with lower leverage, and he can't hold on many open losing positions as he can now.

What i've seen people do with this kind of approach is go with $100, try to make back the deposit and just do it on repeat. Like he said, if he's caught buying at the high like @Overnight does (gaziiinggg), he would just lose $100, hoping that he already made 2-3x his deposit by that time. IF not, it's just $100 loss. win win I guess.

This is not the kind of trading you would worry about DD or R:R bullshit, this is just all in and hope for the best.

You made lot of false statements.
Did you open small accounts and were treated by those brokers? I did with a lot of them and never had any problems.
Gave proofs on your claims or you were lying and misleading.
I am sure you have never had any experiences with the brokers you accused.

 

[jl1575]

Intrigued, I was looking for something that would be conflicted with each other.
The above three entries: order # is inverse to the times of entry /exit. That is pretty odd.
order # is generated by brokerage, and should be numbered according to trade time sequentially. Any explanations?

714: 1:51:11 / 1:51:17
716: 1:46:46 / 1:51:16
717: 1:14:36 / 1:51:11

 

[Hardison]

It looks like it is automatic trading, as you can not trade every hour of the day manually (unless you have someone to trade in shifts); In this way, it is rather a demonstration of super programming capacity rather than discipline though.

Ea procedure is an assistant. it is a person who formulates a trading plan and strictly abides by it.

 

[schizo]

I see some discrepancy in the time stamps. Consider the two trades in the above pic.

The first trade was closed at 16:21:57 (A), which was clearly AFTER the second trade was opened at 16:08:08 (B). But even more absurd is that the second trade closed BEFORE the close of the first trade (A and C).

How do you explain that?

 

[Hardison]

View attachment 301322

Intrigued, I was looking for something that would be conflicted with each other.
The above three entries: order # is inverse to the times of entry /exit. That is pretty odd.
order # is generated by brokerage, and should be numbered according to trade time sequentially. Any explanations?

714: 1:51:11 / 1:51:17
716: 1:46:46 / 1:51:16
717: 1:14:36 / 1:51:11

I don't know. I just took a screenshot of the actual data at that time.

 

[schizo]

View attachment 301322

Intrigued, I was looking for something that would be conflicted with each other.
The above three entries: order # is inverse to the times of entry /exit. That is pretty odd.
order # is generated by brokerage, and should be numbered according to trade time sequentially. Any explanations?

714: 1:51:11 / 1:51:17
716: 1:46:46 / 1:51:16
717: 1:14:36 / 1:51:11

Oh, I see you posted one pretty similar to mine. I shoulda read the posts before posting. Anyway, good thing we're on the same page.

 

[Hardison]

One thing that is fishy: if someone can consistently generate such 100% profitable trades over a lengthy period of time and 10K trades with confidence, why don't you scale it up to make millions easily?

Because of the risk control management, the transaction plan needs to be designed according to the risk tolerance of each account.

 

[Hardison]

View attachment 301323

I see some discrepancy in the time stamps. Consider the two trades in the above pic.

The first trade was closed at 16:21:57 (A), which was clearly AFTER the second trade was opened at 16:08:08 (B). But even more absurd is that the second trade closed BEFORE the close of the first trade (A and C).

How do you explain that?

I sort by closing time.