100% winning rate of 10000 deals in 100 days
- Thread starter Hardison
- Start date
He said it himself that he is holding draw down (after literally everyone said what he was claiming is impossible) ...
What we can see is that some trades hold 30+, some even 50+ (which means 30%-50% of his account) more DD compared to the tiny TP he takes.
He shows his "100%" winning system yet is refusing to show his losing trades or open trades (which was already established to be massive draw down), if that isn't hiding one side of his trading results i don't know what is.
What more do you need to know? Even Padutrader would realise this is BS.
Last edited:
Let's see...
Person A comes up with some inane bullshit.
Person B says "this is inane bullshit."
You jump on person *B* with "And you can prove all you say?"
I'm going to take a wild guess here and say that this "Hardison" is a sock puppet account of yours, which is why you're defending it. If you try to deny it, then the only reasonable response to you is "And you can prove all you say?"
Here's a big clue for you: whoever makes the initial claim has the burden of proof. Not people who are (properly) cynical about that claim. That's how rational thinking works.
/thread, any other replies are superfluous.
No, sir, that is the exact opposite of how it works.
When accused of a crime, the burden of proof is on the state, i.e. the one making the accusation of wrong-doing. That is how rational thinking works lol
When accused of fraud on an internet bulletin board, the burden of proof is on the one leveling the accusation.
The reason is that is almost impossible to prove one didn't commit the offense, i.e. effectively being asked to prove the negative. That is why the state must prove a crime beyond reasonable doubt.
His whole point is about discipline.
But he's applying discipline in the wrong place.
Discipline to take profit ?!
Never heard anyone with profit taking issues.
Discipline is about gambling issues.
What is Gambling ?!
Negative expectancy plays.
Don't be a sucker.
That's when you need discipline.
Pretty sure OP is a sucker.
A disciplined sucker.
Congrats !
0.xx lot is already too much.
Most strategy don't deserve any allocation.
OP is just blowing up 10,000 cents with consistency.
But he's applying discipline in the wrong place.
Discipline to take profit ?!
Never heard anyone with profit taking issues.
Discipline is about gambling issues.
What is Gambling ?!
Negative expectancy plays.
Don't be a sucker.
That's when you need discipline.
Pretty sure OP is a sucker.
A disciplined sucker.
Congrats !
0.xx lot is already too much.
Most strategy don't deserve any allocation.
OP is just blowing up 10,000 cents with consistency.
Last edited:
He is showing all these consecutive trading on entry (time stamp and price) and exit (time stamp and price), what is the lying you are accusing him about?
Because it is true
If you are fine with liars here or anywhere else, good for you, luckily the majority isn't.
Since his intentions are to sell a book it's good he is getting exposed. He has had every chance to be transparent but refuses, then that's what you get.
He is transparent about his entry time and price, and exit time and price as well for each trade, what more transparent you ask for?