100% winning rate of 10000 deals in 100 days

Because his intention is to show one side of his trading and hide the other side.

One person said that and now the entire message board runs with it like a dog who won't let go of a meatless bone.
 
Yes, the amount of 10000 cents a year, when the position is broken, only 100 dollars will be lost. Train discipline.:sneaky:
Compared with stock investment and futures investment, it is obvious that in foreign exchange investment, the training cost of cents account is very low.:finger:
 
Football and computer programming technology can be started by children aged 10. Similarly, financial investment and trading can also be started.:banghead:
 
That's right. I would like to emphasize once again that what we are showing now is just the profit making approach. The key is risk control management and strict discipline.:sneaky:

Funny, since you are hiding both your risk control management and strict discipline by hiding your open trades or losing trades.
 
Absolutely true and that was my point in both of my posts made to this thread. Most elitetraders don't pay attention to these other elements. That is probably why so many give you heat when you say what is possible to earn in profits. They cannot conceive of the opportunities the market offers because they do not consider anything other than buy and sell. Through your posts it is obvious to me that your understanding is beyond that of your critics.

I was reading a journal here a few weeks ago where the journal author scalps MES contracts. He gets all kinds of heat from people telling him he can't or shouldn't average in because one hedge fund trader said "losers average losers" one time in prehistory. These critics never stop to think "what if his position size and trading plan factors in that in some trades he will NOT get an opportunity to add up to his full size?" They see only the RISK of loss to his adding. They don't consider his loss of OPPORTUNINTY if he doesn't add.

It looks like everyone here is paying very much attention to what the OP is trying to hide and basically already admitted to.

He doesn't get heat because people here think what he is doing is impossible, he gets heat because he is lying and isn't transparent, which again, he basically admitted to.

So yes, his understanding of trying to scam is beyond that of his critics, yet he is failing miserably.
 
One person said that and now the entire message board runs with it like a dog who won't let go of a meatless bone.

Because it is true :banghead:.

If you are fine with liars here or anywhere else, good for you, luckily the majority isn't.

Since his intentions are to sell a book it's good he is getting exposed. He has had every chance to be transparent but refuses, then that's what you get.
 
I was reading a journal here a few weeks ago where the journal author scalps MES contracts. He gets all kinds of heat from people telling him he can't or shouldn't average in because one hedge fund trader said "losers average losers" one time in prehistory. These critics never stop to think "what if his position size and trading plan factors in that in some trades he will NOT get an opportunity to add up to his full size?" They see only the RISK of loss to his adding. They don't consider his loss of OPPORTUNINTY if he doesn't add.

With this statement I do not for 100% agree. You should read Baron's journal to see what the result was of his averaging down. All trades that were part of the average down theory (23 trades!)ended all up, till today, in a loss. Total loss is close to 70% in one year time.
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/barons-crypto-trading-journal.361987/
 
100% winning rate of 10000 deals in 100 days

--->

100% winning rate of 1000 000 deals in 105 days


And OP will be richer than Elon Musk!!!


OP is such a great guy. We did such a (fake) thing before.
So we understand OP very well.


As of now, OP is having a great time laughing at foolish people.
 
Back
Top