Didn't anyone notice that they asked Tulsi Gabbard so few questions? No doubt to sideline her and avoid her getting into a skirmish with Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden. Since, the moderators call those in the debate, they can pit one Democrat with another or totally, avoid anyone that can ruin their favorites! It is obvious that Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden got the most airtime! Not that it is going to help them any? If they thought the Fake Trump shooting liberals in the Kingsman spoof video was bad, wait till the attack ads of the Super Pacs start airing!
10/15 Democratic Debate.
- Thread starter Wallet
- Start date
Warren took hits lest night, plural.
Yes, she got dragged on Medicare for all and that is a major weakness but what’s under the radar was her stupid wealth tax idea got brought out to the wood shed.
I see a lot about Biden going the way of The dodo but he scored points last night. It won’t be long before he calls Warrens “plans” a wall Mexico will pay for.
If Warren is going to get this nomination she will have to adjust her platform to get more in line with actual democrats.
Biden is the winner from last night. No question about it.
Buttigieg and Klobuchar went in trying to reset the table. A good move. They both have potential but need to get points from Warren and her support is still sketchy at best.
Yes, she got dragged on Medicare for all and that is a major weakness but what’s under the radar was her stupid wealth tax idea got brought out to the wood shed.
I see a lot about Biden going the way of The dodo but he scored points last night. It won’t be long before he calls Warrens “plans” a wall Mexico will pay for.
If Warren is going to get this nomination she will have to adjust her platform to get more in line with actual democrats.
Biden is the winner from last night. No question about it.
Buttigieg and Klobuchar went in trying to reset the table. A good move. They both have potential but need to get points from Warren and her support is still sketchy at best.
This can happen when you let someone who is not even a democrat run as a democrat and then re-register as a socialist after the election, as he did last time.
Under the British and Canadian systems, the leader of the party would just boot Bernie out- as we just saw Trudeau boot out a couple of his cabinet members from the Liberal party, and Boris just booted out a bunch from the Tory party. Something to be said for that.
When you say "Biden," you are referring to the man now known as Hunter's father, right?
Biden may have won last night, but not on this planet. Maybe out on the Hale-Bopp Comet where your Mothership is based.
Give it up, lad. Your man is circling the toilet bowl. Warren has growing problems because she has become the front-runner so there is a shiny side to her problems too. Biden has growing problems that have no shiny side.
Last edited:
Well, that should be the final straw that sinks Bernie’s chances..... kiss of death for a campaign.
Biden’s the winner? Must have watched a different channel.
Got a little tired of candidates being afraid to answer a stupid question negatively.
For example when the question was "Would you add additional justices to the SC to protect Roe v. Wade?" the right answer is that is not really a precedent any President should set to politically alter a court for 1 specific case not to mention 9 justices is enough. The politics is present in the nomination process already, and at worst it should stay there and no where else.
Some candidates almost got it right saying this is an issue for Congress to address rather then let each State come up with some hodge podge of laws that dance all around the SC. But they first said yes and failed to shoot down the stupid idea of toying with the number of Justices.
Most of the candidates lacked balls to say "What a dumb fucking idea, let me tell you how we should address this"
For example when the question was "Would you add additional justices to the SC to protect Roe v. Wade?" the right answer is that is not really a precedent any President should set to politically alter a court for 1 specific case not to mention 9 justices is enough. The politics is present in the nomination process already, and at worst it should stay there and no where else.
Some candidates almost got it right saying this is an issue for Congress to address rather then let each State come up with some hodge podge of laws that dance all around the SC. But they first said yes and failed to shoot down the stupid idea of toying with the number of Justices.
Most of the candidates lacked balls to say "What a dumb fucking idea, let me tell you how we should address this"
Murder is a state crime. The legality of abortion is for states to decide not for the federal government. End of story.
You would need to define "winner". If that means that he will continue to lead in the polls and will be the nominee, then yes he was the winner. (The Idiot Dem base is scared of the other candidates).
murder haha