Alea iacta est..
You need to try and speak to me, not them. You have flaws in cognition where you don't successfully read short sentences. If you are telling me what I said by not actually quoting me, you are failing.
If you are telling them what you think I meant through the filter of your poor reading comprehension then you are boring, to me anyway. The Wolf of Old Street types, ten a penny.
As you are a little handicapped but could have an interesting background, I'll explain. I had a policing role for a number of years working as an anti-poaching ranger in several African countries. I was many times embedded with national troops and was usually granted a superior rank should I need to override. I was trusted basically. I also worked as a civilian contractor for the UK police in a non-policing but sensitive technical role, I spent a lot of time chatting with officers at HQs. Two of my mom side cousins are FBI.
So.. I can take a the law is the law, is the law view only as long as the law is reputable. Even then I expect people collectively to give the police leeway, enemy of the good are the perfect etc. etc.
However, from an outsider perspective and being somebody who does real ALL the words, I see how the US justice system of which the police are a part, fell short. Young people (and some adults) don't have fully developed minds and are prone to get idealistic and belligerent.
When the POTUS is worse then they are, control goes out the window entirely.
Put it another way, have you ever seen somebody warned not to tease the dog, but they do tease the dog and they get a bite or a fright? You don't generally blame the dog.
