1 Trade a Day or 100+ Trades a Day?

I feel the only two paths to profitable trading is you either put on 1 trade a day or 100+.

1 If you put on 1 trade a day then you very carefully plan out the day and the trade with your stop and profit target and once you enter you let the trade go. Whatever happens reflects how well you planned your trade. However with this approach you have very large fluctuation assuming you are using large targets.

2 If you put on 100+ trades a day then you are basically scalping almost every move as soon as price breaks a certain level you either aggressively trade the break as a momentum trade or your fade it expecting a return to the break.
With this approach though you do need a low cost broker with the lowest commissions and even then you may need member rates.

I think nearly every pro trading firm trades strategy # as reflected buy the fact that many firms do 1-5% of market volume in many securities.
So in ES that is like 10000-50000 contracts a day for example.
It is an insane amount of trading.

But for the retail guy it seems strategy #2 is out of reach without large capital, tech, risk management, algos, traders, and exchange member rates.

Strategy #1 is doable but it's an all or nothing mentality that you need to develop. It is the total opposite of #2.

The problem with the 1-100 trades "middle ground" is that basically it eventually all devolves into overtrading, trading too large, too impulsive, too emotional, or eventually you end up giving back all your gains on 10 trades in 1 trades if all in/out or all your profits trading 1 lot on a 10 lot if scale in/out.

I've made a nice living averaging less than 10 trades per day. That being said, when I was automated, there were days when over 10 trades would hit my computer in a second. But that stopped working. My programmer lost 35K in about 30 seconds and he quit trading. He makes a nice living programming for a Minneapolis company. I was crazy enough to stick with it, and it's worked out.
 
If you put on 100+ trades a day then you are basically scalping almost every move as soon as price breaks

Not necessarily, you can also trade 100 different stocks each day, without scalping them.

This usually requires an automated trading system, however.
 
I feel the only two paths to profitable trading is you either put on 1 trade a day or 100+.

1 If you put on 1 trade a day then you very carefully plan out the day and the trade with your stop and profit target and once you enter you let the trade go. Whatever happens reflects how well you planned your trade. However with this approach you have very large fluctuation assuming you are using large targets.

2 If you put on 100+ trades a day then you are basically scalping almost every move as soon as price breaks a certain level you either aggressively trade the break as a momentum trade or your fade it expecting a return to the break.
With this approach though you do need a low cost broker with the lowest commissions and even then you may need member rates.

I think nearly every pro trading firm trades strategy # as reflected buy the fact that many firms do 1-5% of market volume in many securities.
So in ES that is like 10000-50000 contracts a day for example.
It is an insane amount of trading.

But for the retail guy it seems strategy #2 is out of reach without large capital, tech, risk management, algos, traders, and exchange member rates.

Strategy #1 is doable but it's an all or nothing mentality that you need to develop. It is the total opposite of #2.

The problem with the 1-100 trades "middle ground" is that basically it eventually all devolves into overtrading, trading too large, too impulsive, too emotional, or eventually you end up giving back all your gains on 10 trades in 1 trades if all in/out or all your profits trading 1 lot on a 10 lot if scale in/out.
More important than "number of trades" are the market conditions that demand action based on your strat.

If three instruments show the market condition you seek, then trade all three.

Hundreds of trades per day really demands some kind of api or algorithm, unless you're one-click scalping or something.
 
I've made a nice living averaging less than 10 trades per day. That being said, when I was automated, there were days when over 10 trades would hit my computer in a second. But that stopped working. My programmer lost 35K in about 30 seconds and he quit trading. He makes a nice living programming for a Minneapolis company. I was crazy enough to stick with it, and it's worked out.
What market setting?
 
1 trade a day, just trade in the direction of VWAP.

j/k, I tried for months to make a system like this work. It didn't. And it was more than one trade per day except if the market was trending hard.
 
What market setting?

Automated mean reversion. Enveloping long and short. It hasn't worked for many years. Literally over 1000 standing orders waiting for volume spikes. I remember being in the office and looking at each other and saying "This is too risky. We can't do this anymore." That was 15 years ago. I can't imagine trading that way with all of the Meme stocks lately. I'm just an old timer momentum trader these days.
 
I would say none. Trade as per our interest and at the right places so it can be 1 or 2 or even 50. But it should be right and should give you good returns.
 
If were to hire a trader to trade then I would present two options:

1 One trade a day. All In/Out. Wait for STRONG trends where it doesn't even matter where you enter you make money because the trend is that strong.

2 Put on 100+ trades a day doing mean reversion scalping in/out via scaling. However must avoid the strongest trends. Shut down when account goes up/down a % amount.

The reason why TopStep Trader probably has 95%+ failure rate is you have guys with:

1 No patience to wait for that ONE perfect trade.

2 Lack the low commission structure (exchange member rates) + automated risk management required for 100+ trades.
 
The truth about this industry is that Brokers, Exchanges, and vendors like TopStep Trader are heavily incentivized to MAKE YOU LOSE.

Because After you Lose:

1 You trade more (which means more commissions, exchange fees, combines, etc.) in an attempt to get "even". And the more you lose the more you trade and bigger risks you take. You end up churning the entire account.

Look at the risk management features that a broker like Tradovate offers where you can set your daily loss limits. Such a simple feature every broker could have offered to prevent blowups but they want you to blow up. Incentives explain almost everything.

I think it was Victor Niederhoffer who wrote in his book that the 1000+ Billion $ wall street infrastructure must be paid for with your losses.
 
Back
Top