1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today

i used the word if and the reply was in a humorous way. people like you can only respond with name calling. that reveals your character. people with short fuses always reveal themselves.
 
Blah Blah Blah Blah. It was the looney's pushing for the tax who were freaking out about said clause yet I have never been able to find a thing about it, would be a pleasent addition to the deal if correct.
 
If the clause exists in a legally binding deal then at the very least it forms the basis for a legal case against any implementation, this thread is dead, it used to be about highlighting information but the majority of useful commentators have left and now all we have is people willing to take it onto a personal level, stick your brigde.

In the bigger picture since 2011 there has been little progress, if the greedy .... in the eu fail to submit a working plan by new year we can assume they never will, if sander wins all is lost.
 
sheda said:
If the clause exists in a legally binding deal then at the very least it forms the basis for a legal case against any implementation, this thread is dead, it used to be about highlighting information but the majority of useful commentators have left and now all we have is people willing to take it onto a personal level, stick your brigde.

In the bigger picture since 2011 there has been little progress, if the greedy .... in the eu fail to submit a working plan by new year we can assume they never will, if sander wins all is lost.
More...
i told you it was not personal but you are the one who makes it personal because you have chosen not to control your temper. you put personal insults with each succeeding post. if that is the face you want to present to the world it is your image and your right to do so.
 
sheda said:
With all due respect what is your point? I posted the latest news on the American front which is inline with the purpose of this thread, at page 1147 we are all aware its an idea that will not die though its not sidetracked in the state states because its never even got on track in the states.
More...
it depends on your definition of the phrase never got on track. it never got out of defazio's committee in congress. yes, there are are thousands of proposals that get bottled up in committee and never see the light of the day but some eventually do come. remember the income tax in the US was not instituted till the 20th century
 
Both mouthpieces pushing this foul agenda are from a certain group. Take a wild guess. And No doubt there will be 'exemptions'. But.. not for you.

Senator Bernie Sanders (mother's name Glassberg)
Ron Lieber (NY Times owned by Arthur Sulzberger)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: d08
Trading too much hurts returns and is extremely hazardous to our wealth, and the less we do of it, the better off most of us will be.
More...

The usual drivel from the absolutely clueless followed by a comment section full of envious ridden filth who are alright with it as long as they...

I cant remember where the following is from but its the best point to counter the "trading to much is bad mmm k" line..

The tax also distorts major functions of the markets, by punishing markets that reprice in a timely fashion you make wrongly priced assets a sure thing. Markets with a high rate of turn over such as the currency markets are constantly pricing information in, what you call " socially useless transactions" is what in the real world turns out to be creating an efficient market... Imagine for a moment if the illiquid low turn over mortgage derivative market had anything like the transaction rate of the currency markets, those assets would have been repriced far earlier and far more efficiently and would have never become such a danger as to risk the global financial system..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top