EU lawyers say transaction tax plan is illegal
(Reuters) - A plan to tax financial transactions in 11 European Union member states from 2014 is illegal, the bloc's lawyers have concluded, dealing what could be a final blow to the measure as proposed.
[...]
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/09/10/uk-eu-transactiontax-exclusive-idUKBRE9890JG20130910
Also, from the FT:
[...]The Council legal service paper challenges one of the core parts of the so-called âresidence principleâ â taxing institutions according to where their headquarters are based, rather than where the trade is executed.
It concluded the definition of where a group is established âexceeds member Statesâ jurisdiction for taxation under the norms of international customary law as they are understood by the unionâ.
It added that the measure âis not compatibleâ with the EU treaties âas it infringes upon the taxing competences of non-participating member statesâ. Finally it found that the provision was âdiscriminatory and likely to lead to distortion of competition to the detriment of non participating member statesâ.
[...]
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b0a6c7a8-19fd-11e3-93e8-00144feab7de.html?siteedition=uk
(Reuters) - A plan to tax financial transactions in 11 European Union member states from 2014 is illegal, the bloc's lawyers have concluded, dealing what could be a final blow to the measure as proposed.
[...]
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/09/10/uk-eu-transactiontax-exclusive-idUKBRE9890JG20130910
Also, from the FT:
[...]The Council legal service paper challenges one of the core parts of the so-called âresidence principleâ â taxing institutions according to where their headquarters are based, rather than where the trade is executed.
It concluded the definition of where a group is established âexceeds member Statesâ jurisdiction for taxation under the norms of international customary law as they are understood by the unionâ.
It added that the measure âis not compatibleâ with the EU treaties âas it infringes upon the taxing competences of non-participating member statesâ. Finally it found that the provision was âdiscriminatory and likely to lead to distortion of competition to the detriment of non participating member statesâ.
[...]
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b0a6c7a8-19fd-11e3-93e8-00144feab7de.html?siteedition=uk