I own the 50th stock exchange of the United States.
This tax will destroy their markets.
The interpretation that trading is secondary to the financing of a company makes what happens to the company afterward irrelevant is so preposterous that there are many companies that will never reach their full value when the argument for why it isn't ever possible for stocks to reach full fair value is exactly the frictions that this tax creates.
If you don't understand this... there is no hope for you as a stock trader, financial analyst, or any other occupation to which liquidity is required to have efficiency in order to prosper through hard times.
Since one group of individual political organizations can simply shrug off this issue by adding that the tax is controversial, then there should be at least some people who do understand the liquidity traps Japan brought to themselves shouldn't see the future any differently if this tax is really implemented.
Also, there will be less than the amount estimated raised, and nearly every market where this will be implemented or has been implemented has never recovered to their highs.
Great investments, so anybody who talks about those countries now in the United States should not be paid attention to since liquidity is reduced to a point where the exponential raise of geometric weights predominantly chosen as the broad benchmarks we measure performance to won't ever be able to overcome the undersiding caused by this weighting.
Beware anybody who hasn't mentioned why it always seems like we go down faster than up, because now these markets will always go down faster than up, but it isn't that that was the way it has always been so much so than that it won't allow wealth to transfer to third parties except through overtrading, manipulation, and far worse categorical technical difficulties and compliance issues than the USA has or will ever have.
Pity. Those countries had a good chance of not going back to war due to economic difficulty, but that's what's going to happen and whether you'd like to debate with me, if you're argument is that there will be any benefit to this is only to the governments and socialists who support such a measure.
Note the Englishman doesn't have to know whether this is stupid or not, but those who have been unable to compete with US Powerhouse of Wealth will continue to be unable to compete and far into the future as well.
This tax will destroy their markets.
The interpretation that trading is secondary to the financing of a company makes what happens to the company afterward irrelevant is so preposterous that there are many companies that will never reach their full value when the argument for why it isn't ever possible for stocks to reach full fair value is exactly the frictions that this tax creates.
If you don't understand this... there is no hope for you as a stock trader, financial analyst, or any other occupation to which liquidity is required to have efficiency in order to prosper through hard times.
Since one group of individual political organizations can simply shrug off this issue by adding that the tax is controversial, then there should be at least some people who do understand the liquidity traps Japan brought to themselves shouldn't see the future any differently if this tax is really implemented.
Also, there will be less than the amount estimated raised, and nearly every market where this will be implemented or has been implemented has never recovered to their highs.
Great investments, so anybody who talks about those countries now in the United States should not be paid attention to since liquidity is reduced to a point where the exponential raise of geometric weights predominantly chosen as the broad benchmarks we measure performance to won't ever be able to overcome the undersiding caused by this weighting.
Beware anybody who hasn't mentioned why it always seems like we go down faster than up, because now these markets will always go down faster than up, but it isn't that that was the way it has always been so much so than that it won't allow wealth to transfer to third parties except through overtrading, manipulation, and far worse categorical technical difficulties and compliance issues than the USA has or will ever have.
Pity. Those countries had a good chance of not going back to war due to economic difficulty, but that's what's going to happen and whether you'd like to debate with me, if you're argument is that there will be any benefit to this is only to the governments and socialists who support such a measure.
Note the Englishman doesn't have to know whether this is stupid or not, but those who have been unable to compete with US Powerhouse of Wealth will continue to be unable to compete and far into the future as well.
