Quote from piezoe:
I will not accept arguments, in the present case, based on prediction of future politics, nor ad hominem arguments, of course.
I am an advocate of the tax implemented in the way Tobin intended it.
As a means of raising money, it is a terrible idea. As a means of cleaning up the market, it's brilliant. It must be set very low and at just the precise level to do great good and virtually no harm.
I will change my mind instantly if anyone can present a logical counter argument without rejecting the assumption that HFT poses a greater risk to the market than benefit.
_______________________
"Common wisdom is usually wrong." -- Gore Vidal
No one is proposing implementing the FTT in the way Tobin intended it. In fact, Tobin said the tax should be limited to currency markets only. I haven't seen that proposal yet.
Berkeley Economics Professor, Barry Eichengreen, knew Tobin well and co-wrote several published research papers with the Nobel Prize winner. Regarding James Tobin and the Tobin tax, Professor Eichengreen recently said: âJames Tobin was a friend of mine, my mentor, and, for a brief privileged period, coauthor. Tobin would not have been pleased to see his proposal repurposed in this way.â
"If the aim is to augment revenues, a Tobin tax is the wrong tool. Indeed, Tobin designed it to solve an entirely different problem: excessive volatility in currency markets. By discouraging foreign-exchange transactions, Tobinâs proposal sought to promote exchange-rate stability by preventing national currencies from coming under speculative attack."
What does Tobin's original proposal have to do with taxing stocks and bonds? Nothing.
Professor Eichengreen continues:
"European leaders sometimes extend Tobinâs logic from the currency market to financial markets generally. An across-the-board tax on transactions, they argue, would dampen financial volatility. But the logic behind this conclusion is lacking . What we know is that a tax on transactions would result in fewer transactions. Some investors would exit the market. But which ones â the opportunist speculators, who sell when everyone else is selling, or the contrarian speculators, who do the opposite and stabilize volatile markets?
Maybe a Tobin tax is intended to shrink Europeâs bloated financial sector. In that case, it is, once again, misdirected. Europeâs problem is its banks, which are too big to fail â and also too big to save. A Tobin tax would do nothing to shrink them. On the contrary, by discouraging trading in securities, it would encourage investors to shift their funds into bank accounts and certificates of deposit."
http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/europe-s-tobin-tax-distraction#UwWFsaemTbkKqh02.99
http://financialtransactiontaxes.com/
