1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today

The European Commission's proposed financial transaction tax (FTT) would have "unprecedented extraterritorial impacts," a number of trade associations have warned in a letter to the G20 finance ministers.

Representatives of the Australian Financial Markets Association (AFMA), the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA), the Investment Industry Association of Canada (IIAC), the Japan Securities Dealers Association (JSDA), and the Korea Financial Investment Association (KOFIA) composed the letter to "express strong opposition" to the measure. A request is made that the ministers also resist the proposals.[...]

http://www.tax-news.com/news/EU_FTT_Under_Fire_From_International_Trade_Associations____60494.html
 
http://www.economonitor.com/blog/20...missions-proposed-financial-transactions-tax/

"There is something disquieting about policy makers deciding that it is convenient to use the tax code as a tool for punishing either corporations or individuals that they do not like; it is vindictive populism masquerading as the pursuit of fairness. If EU or other policy makers believe that financial institutions or their employees behaved in a criminal manner, then they should go after them in court, where these supposed wrong doers may face their accusers, as is done in civilized societies"
 
FTT contravenes G20 agreements, warn global markets bodies

In a bid to see the G20 overrule Brussels, the groups - whose members control trillions of dollars of assets around the world - have asked ministers meeting in Washington to “oppose” the measure. “Now is not the time to experiment with policies that will fragment markets, increase market volatility, harm savings and impede growth,” the letter warns.

The trade bodies argue that the FTT would have “unprecedented extraterritorial impacts, contrary to G20 principles”. It adds that the plans will damage economic growth, increase the cost of financing for companies and governments, and create “harmful spillover effects on the global economy”.

t is signed by the London-based Global Financial Markets Association as well as the Japan Securities Dealers Association, the Australian Financial Markets Association (AFMA), the Investment Industry Association of Canada and the Korea Financial Investment Association.

The controversial tax, which plans to impose a 0.1pc levy on the value of financial transactions and 0.01pc on derivatives, was first proposed in September 2011. Britain has led the opposition from the start, warning that the tax would be unworkable and harm the City.

But European leaders, with Francois Hollande from France to the fore, have made the FTT a key policy through which to make banks "pay" for the financial crisis and raise revenues too. Eleven EU countries, including Germany and Italy, have signed up to the FTT. EU officials have said they want the tax to apply across the single market.

The letter, dated April 16, argues the “FTT would apply to transactions well beyond the 11 EU member states that have agreed to adopt it” because it would be imposed to all transactions of a bank headquartered in the markets, regardless of its counterparty.

As it a result it contravenes the Communique made by the G20 just two months ago in which states pledged to “monitor and minimize the negative spillover on other countries of policies implemented for domestic purposes”.

The letter warns that the FTT will “create a further headwind to global economic recovery” because it will “increase the cost of equity and debt financing for both both governments and corporates [and] the cost of hedging transactions undertaken in the real economy to manage risk”.

Two weeks ago Icap warned that the FTT would “damage mainstream economies” and that companies would find it more expensive to secure finance.

In a separate report, Barclays said the “politically-motivated” FTT could cut EU GDP by as much as 0.3pc, at a time when many eurozone countries are in recession. It said criticisms of the tax were “numerous”.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...20-agreements-warn-global-markets-bodies.html
 
..and another one:

http://www.citytalk.fm/news/business/20130419-osborne-issues-legal-challenge-to-eu-bank-tax/

[...]Treasury insiders said the worry was that it could knock significant value off British pension funds and investments.

They characterised the legal challenge, which may take years to be heard, as an important insurance policy in the legislative battle to get the tax amended.

However, analysts said that the move marked a significant escalation in tension between the UK and the Commission.

Mats Persson of think tank Open Europe said: "The economic, legal and political implications of this move for future EU-UK relations are huge… Legally, it could set out the parameters for how a 'flexible Europe' involving different levels of participation in the EU – which Prime Minister David Cameron has said he champions – will be governed.

"Politically, it’s a test of the extent to which the UK – as a non-eurozone member - can halt or change EU measures with a profound impact on its national interest. Therefore, it will be a key issue in the on-going debate about the UK’s continued EU membership."[...]
 
Liberals are the scourge of the earth. They want the all power centralized and they would love nothing more than to be able to allocate 100% of wealth in the manner that they see fit (which coincides with them getting elected/re-elected).
 
Back
Top