1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today

Quote from Grandluxe:

You still living in France? Are you personally affected?

Yes.No. But I am super pissed at the way the banks are getting rewarded with this tax.
 
Financial experts and politicians debated the possible merits and pitfalls of a Europe-wide financial transaction tax

The meeting saw support for the tax offered by Avinash Persaud, the chairman of financial advisory firm Intelligence Capital, Sony Kapoor, the managing director of think tank Re-Define and Stephany Griffith-Jones, a financial markets programme director at the Initiative for Policy Dialogue of Colombia University.

The commentators agreed the tax would curb the activities of high-frequency and intermediary traders as intended without damaging the real economy. It was suggested the tax could be directly beneficial to the economy by boosting GDP by 0.25% and deterring the practices most responsible for building up risk.

http://www.fundweb.co.uk/europe/european-meeting-debates-financial-transaction-tax/1045711.article


However, Jurgen Klute MP countered: “How could a financial transaction tax hurt the economy when the tax will in fact reduce risk, the very element which brought along the crisis?”


This is beyond words.
 
Nine EU countries have asked the Danish Presidency to accelerate ongoing work on the proposed Financial transaction tax

http://fr.reuters.com/article/frEuroRpt/idFRL5E8D76LV20120207

(google translation)
PARIS, Feb. 7 (Reuters) - Nine EU countries European asked the Danish Presidency to accelerate ongoing work on the proposed transaction tax Financial, said Tuesday the French Minister of Economy, Baroin.

The French government announced last month will implement such taxation without waiting for its partners Europeans, on a schedule that remains unclear.

In a statement, Baroin welcomes eight other countries (Germany, Austria, Belgium, Spain, Finland, Greece, Italy and Portugal) and France have sent a letter common to the EU Presidency to invite him to "accelerate Council's work, so as to complete a first reading draft directive in the first half of 2012 ".

"The joint letter demonstrates that the proposal of a tax French registered in the next Finance Bill amendment is complementary to the community process and can cause other states to join the movement, "adds Minister of Economy. (Marc Angrand, edited by Sophie Louet)
 
Quote from Explorer:

Nine EU countries have asked the Danish Presidency to accelerate ongoing work on the proposed Financial transaction tax

http://fr.reuters.com/article/frEuroRpt/idFRL5E8D76LV20120207

(google translation)
PARIS, Feb. 7 (Reuters) - Nine EU countries European asked the Danish Presidency to accelerate ongoing work on the proposed transaction tax Financial, said Tuesday the French Minister of Economy, Baroin.

The French government announced last month will implement such taxation without waiting for its partners Europeans, on a schedule that remains unclear.

In a statement, Baroin welcomes eight other countries (Germany, Austria, Belgium, Spain, Finland, Greece, Italy and Portugal) and France have sent a letter common to the EU Presidency to invite him to "accelerate Council's work, so as to complete a first reading draft directive in the first half of 2012 ".

"The joint letter demonstrates that the proposal of a tax French registered in the next Finance Bill amendment is complementary to the community process and can cause other states to join the movement, "adds Minister of Economy. (Marc Angrand, edited by Sophie Louet)

it's somewhat encouraging all 8 countries are "the usual suspects", countries which we knew were pro-ftt. no doubt baroin tried to get as many countries on-board as possible, so there are also 8 euro-countries (and a number of eu-countries) that didn't sign on.
 
The DeFazio bill has been gaining cosponsors this month... now up to 27.

They are all Democrats... every last one.

Anyone know the significance of co-sponsors? Does it actually influence the legislative process? ...my assumption is that it is just a political tool and carries no actual weight in the legislative process.
 
Quote from BA_Trader:

The DeFazio bill has been gaining cosponsors this month... now up to 27.

They are all Democrats... every last one.

Anyone know the significance of co-sponsors? Does it actually influence the legislative process? ...my assumption is that it is just a political tool and carries no actual weight in the legislative process.

No Repubican in their right mind would ever co sponsor this bill (LOL). Anyway I think the bill he introduced in 2009 had 30 some co sponsors. You can rest assured that this bill isn't going anywhere (not in this congress).

-Guru
 
Quote from BA_Trader:

The DeFazio bill has been gaining cosponsors this month... now up to 27.

They are all Democrats... every last one.

Anyone know the significance of co-sponsors? Does it actually influence the legislative process? ...my assumption is that it is just a political tool and carries no actual weight in the legislative process.

I just hope and pray people can see through the democrats policies and their lies, class warfare, circle jerk with the unions and manipulation of the truth to gain more and more power for themselves and over our lives. I despise ever single one of them.

But, yes, this bill isn't going anywhere.
 
Quote from Stok:

I just hope and pray people can see through the democrats policies and their lies, class warfare, circle jerk with the unions and manipulation of the truth to gain more and more power for themselves and over our lives. I despise ever single one of them.

But, yes, this bill isn't going anywhere.

They can only see the objective truth if they are presented with it, but at present we have the media we have. Objectivity has long since departed the MSM and no longer has a voice in our society.
 
Europe still keen on financial transaction tax:

http://www.ftseglobalmarkets.com/in...-keen-on-financial-transaction-tax&Itemid=161

Markus Ferber (EPP, DE), nonetheless warned against seeing the tax as the "magic solution to everything". He said that it needed to tackle high-frequency and intermediary players more closely, to ensure that the cost is not simply transferred down the line to pension funds which invest the capital they raise in financial products and are therefore involved in financial transactions.

The pitfalls: A key problem with the Commission proposal highlighted by Mr Kapoor and various MEPs was the need to review the point at which the tax would be levied. The tax should be payable to legalise a financial transaction and not merely if one of the actors is resident in a participating Member State. This would widen the tax base, ensuring that the tax remains effective even if only some EU Member States chose to sign up to it initially.

Next steps: Parliament will provide an official opinion to the Commission proposal. The draft report is to be presented in March with a committee vote tentatively scheduled for April and a plenary one for May.

Parliament has been calling for a financial transaction tax, with steadily increasing majorities, for the past two years.
 
Back
Top