1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today

And Sarkozy was trying to make us believe that Obama endorsed the FTT...LOL.

Check out the UK reaction: "We prefer the US way of making finance contribute and we have already been doing it for some time, so no FTT thanks":D
 
Three basis points doesn’t sound like a lot, right? Certainly for those in the Beltway who have managed to run up the U.S. national debt to $15 trillion, three basis points can feel like small potatoes.


The FTT is nearly two times the annual amount U.S. mutual funds and asset managers pay to their institutional brokers.

The FTT is three times the annual amount high frequency traders generate.

Mutual funds and other asset management investors would pay approximately $1.9 billion annually. In other words, explicit transaction fees would jump 22 per cent.

http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2011/11/03/725871/would-you-feel-three-basis-points/
 
Quote from TraDaToR:

And Sarkozy was trying to make us believe that Obama endorsed the FTT...LOL.

Check out the UK reaction: "We prefer the US way of making finance contribute and we have already been doing it for some time, so no FTT thanks":D



Even though I despise Obama, he has it right on this one. No transaction tax.
 
Good Morning,

If we just forced all corporations to go private and didn't allow the public to buy any shares would that make them happy? Are they against transactions, or do they just want a cut from them?
 
I wrote this content earlier tonight and now just saw this WSJ piece.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203716204577016201266293054.html
The Tobin Tax Mirage.

My angle as similar.
--------

FTT is a vendetta or ignorance from the left.

The G-20's hyped showdown for FTT proposals is here and gone. OWS, nurses, Bill Gates, Robin Hood, the Catholic Church and the vocal Franco-German coalition gave FTT their best shot. They failed.

Rep. deFazio and Senator Harkin dusted off their old failed FTT bills and the same failure seems certain already with a tiny number of co-sponsors.

The U.S. position at the G-20 was consistent. No FTT but rather Obama's bank levy on liabilities - not transactions.

It's pretty clear now that taxing transactions won't work, as transactions will disappear, either to tax-free jurisdictions, or they will disappear all together. FTT will reduce tax receipts through economic contraction and job losses. FTT will hurt the same people who call for it, more than banks.

So why do some people and special interest groups still push for FTT, and what do they have in common? FTT pushers are left-leaning Democrats, Socialists, anti-business and anti-finance. They despise and blame traders, hedge funds and banks for the meltdowns and income disparities. They want to penalize financial service providers and redistribute their income to themselves. Hence their name, a Robin Hood Tax.

This means FTT pushers are either ignorant of economics - not unusual for the left - or blinded by their own special interest agendas. They are strong on vengeance but weak on credibility.
 
Andrew Macdougall for Canadian PM Stephen Harper:-

"Canada does not support the tax (on financial transactions). We have an aid program for (the least developed) nations and we do not need another tax. This is not supported by Canada."

Indian PM Manmohan Singh:-

"In India, large segments of the financial sector especially banking and insurance is mostly state owned and equity holders and taxpayers are mostly one and the same. In this environment, it is difficult to see why a financial sector tax, which would only raise the cost of capital even further, would be appropriate."
 
Back
Top