1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today

EC 'quite confident' on UK ftt adoption:

http://www.gfsnews.com/article/3216/1/EC__quite_confident__on_UK_FTT_adoption

A senior member of the European Commission has said he is "quite confident" that the British government will eventually approve an EU-wide financial transaction tax.

"The UK has publicly voiced its disapproval with a number of new measures brought in since the financial crisis, only to then agree to implement them, Olivier Guersent told delegates at Global Financial Strategy's banking debate last week."

"Chancellor George Osborne has previously said the UK could only support an FTT if it was introduced on a global scale. However rival trading centres including the US and Canada have ruled out possibly introducing the levy."

"Without the UK's support, European financial centres such as the Netherlands, Sweden and Ireland are seen as unlikely to agree to introduce the tax."

Speaking alongside Guersent on the panel, European Banking Federation secretary general Guido Ravoet said that the FTT is a "fair tax" given that the banking sector does not have to pay VAT.

However the EBF could only support the tariff if it was introduced worldwide, he said, to ensure that European banks do not lose out compared with their international rivals.

"I appreciate that commissioner Barnier and the commission will put it on the agenda of the G20 in Cannes in order to convince their colleagues to introduce it, but we very much have doubts that our US colleagues will accept the introduction of an FTT.

"That leaves us with a strong risk that businesses will be relocated, because some of the financial businesses are easily moving to another financial centre - that is actually our biggest worry about it."

I guess time will tell whether the UK rolls over and caves into the EU ftt demands. I still say no.

-Guru
 
A friend of mine in Sweden says the "I'm for the FTT if it's global" statement is a way for politicians to say they're for it, while really being against it.

Here's the situation: In most EU countries, the FTT has 65% popular support. But at the same time, many politicians are smart enough to know that the FTT will destroy their financial centers. They also know it will be virtually impossible to get the entire world to agree to an FTT, so that gives them an out; but at the same time they can pander to the public by saying they support the FTT "if it's global." It's a ridiculous game of "I'm for it, but I'm against it." It's crazy, but that's politics.

Put yourself in Cameron's position. Over 60% of the British public supports the FTT. But he also knows that the FTT will burn London to the ground. So he says that he'll support it if it's implemented across the entire world.

The Swedish and Dutch Finance Ministers recently said the same thing.

Quote from listedguru:

I really don't get the whole we're not against the ftt if it's global stuff.

-Guru
 
Protesters in Chicago are calling for a "tax" on contracts traded through CME and CBOE (although at $.25 per contract, it's more of a fee than a tax).

Chicago protesters seek exchange tax to fund jobs

Stand Up Chicago, a coalition planning a protest against economic inequality on Monday, wants to levy a $1.4 billion tax on trading at the city's biggest financial exchanges to fund a jobs program.

Calling CME Group Inc and CBOE Holdings Inc "giant casinos" that fuel the kind of "excessive risk-taking" it says brought on the financial crisis, the group is floating a 25-cent-per-contract tax on the two exchanges.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/10/us-wallstreet-protests-chicago-tax-idUSTRE7995NM20111010
 
Quote from MrPowerBallad:

Protesters in Chicago are calling for a "tax" on contracts traded through CME and CBOE (although at $.25 per contract, it's more of a fee than a tax).

Chicago protesters seek exchange tax to fund jobs

Stand Up Chicago, a coalition planning a protest against economic inequality on Monday, wants to levy a $1.4 billion tax on trading at the city's biggest financial exchanges to fund a jobs program.

Calling CME Group Inc and CBOE Holdings Inc "giant casinos" that fuel the kind of "excessive risk-taking" it says brought on the financial crisis, the group is floating a 25-cent-per-contract tax on the two exchanges.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/10/us-wallstreet-protests-chicago-tax-idUSTRE7995NM20111010

See, all this is being controlled behind the scenes. These protesters didn't come up with that...it was feed to them by the left wing cronies....this is gonna get louder and worse...not saying any of this will happen.

When did the USA become a liberal-douche-bag leaning entitlement society?? And I am still in my 30's and can't believe a lot of this crap.

I also like how they want to tax to fund jobs....again, goes to show how they know NOTHING about economics.
 
Quote from MrPowerBallad:

Protesters in Chicago are calling for a "tax" on contracts traded through CME and CBOE (although at $.25 per contract, it's more of a fee than a tax).

Chicago protesters seek exchange tax to fund jobs

Stand Up Chicago, a coalition planning a protest against economic inequality on Monday, wants to levy a $1.4 billion tax on trading at the city's biggest financial exchanges to fund a jobs program.

Calling CME Group Inc and CBOE Holdings Inc "giant casinos" that fuel the kind of "excessive risk-taking" it says brought on the financial crisis, the group is floating a 25-cent-per-contract tax on the two exchanges.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/10/us-wallstreet-protests-chicago-tax-idUSTRE7995NM20111010




If these liberal clowns pass this in Illinois, then the CME - Chicago Mercantile Exchange will soon become the TME - Texas Mercantile Exchange.
 
Quote from rc8222:

Czech Republic Rejects EU Financial Transaction Tax




https://www.google.com/url?url=http...on+tax&usg=AFQjCNEynSLeQQY77lHdUb7xCP2kmer-Iw

Love the last paragraph:

Vehemently opposed to the idea, the UK has already warned that it will not provide its backing for the tax. Commission President Barroso is now calling for an end to the unanimity rules that have served to hold up such key decisions within the European Union - but any such change would itself require unanimity. This impasse was solved previously through the introduction of 'variable geometry' - allowing a group of member states to take their own path. The eurozone itself is an example of variable geometry.
 
Quote from JamesL:

Love the last paragraph:

Vehemently opposed to the idea, the UK has already warned that it will not provide its backing for the tax. Commission President Barroso is now calling for an end to the unanimity rules that have served to hold up such key decisions within the European Union - but any such change would itself require unanimity. This impasse was solved previously through the introduction of 'variable geometry' - allowing a group of member states to take their own path. The eurozone itself is an example of variable geometry.

My goodness. This Barroso guy is truely a tyrant.
 
Back
Top