Great article from the economist:
http://www.economist.com/blogs/charlemagne/2011/09/financial-transaction-tax-euro-area
http://www.economist.com/blogs/charlemagne/2011/09/financial-transaction-tax-euro-area
Quote from januson:
I live in Denmark and our newly elected government Social Democrats: http://s-dialog.dk/default.aspx?site=english&
has been talking a lot about the financial transaction tax and the traders here i Denmark are angry and frustrated...just as you are![]()
However.... I was thinking...
Would this tax be such a big deal of the swings just was proportional bigger?
What if the introduction of FTT would have the exactly opposite effect?
So instead of an i.e. equity with 2% range just would adapt into a 2.5%. Everyone would still be happy right?
Quote from tomdavis:
In addition to Sweden, the Netherlands, Denmark, Malta and Ireland have all said they wouldn't even consider the FTT unless the UK is part of the package. On more than one occasion the Netherlands Finance Minister, Jan Kees de Jager, has said that if the UK is not included in any type of EU FTT, a large part of the Dutch financial industry will pack up and move to London. Therefore the Netherlands rejects the FTT until London agrees to participate. London won't do it because they know that a large part of their financial market will pack up and move to New York, Singapore, Hong Kong, etc. As long as London holds firm, the EU FTT is DOA.