In the end, I don't think it matters what the Italians do. It boils down to the Swedes and the Brits.
Sweden is against the FTT because it was an unmitigated trainwreck when they tried it back in the 1980s. The Brits are against it because they have, by far, the most to lose. If capital flees Europe, London would lose thousands of financial jobs, tens of billions in economic activity, and billions more in in taxes (both income taxes and capital gains). It's a lose-lose-lose proposition for London. It would be a certifiable act of insanity for the UK to support the FTT.
Sweden is against the FTT because it was an unmitigated trainwreck when they tried it back in the 1980s. The Brits are against it because they have, by far, the most to lose. If capital flees Europe, London would lose thousands of financial jobs, tens of billions in economic activity, and billions more in in taxes (both income taxes and capital gains). It's a lose-lose-lose proposition for London. It would be a certifiable act of insanity for the UK to support the FTT.
Quote from MrPowerBallad:
The question now is when the time comes to vote for an EU level FTT, will Italy vote no since they already have one (which would kill the EU FTT since the vote needs to be unanimous among members), or will they vote yes and have two FTTs, or will they vote yes and scrap their FTT in favor of the EU one?
