1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today

Quote from listedguru:

CBO Warns Obama's Proposed Bank Fee Could End Up Costing Consumers:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalp...-bank-fee-could-end-up-costing-consumers.html

"President Obama's proposed fee on the country's biggest banks receiving taxpayer bailout money would ultimately result in costs to the firms' customers, employees, and investors, a non-partisan Congressional watchdog said today."

"But the Congressional Budget Office today warned that "the ultimate cost of a tax or fee is not necessarily borne by the entity that writes the check to the government."

"The cost of the proposed fee would ultimately be borne to varying degrees by an institution's customers, employees, and investors," the CBO said today in a letter to Sen. Chuck Grassley.

-Guru


Thats good news becuase if they find fault with that money after 10 years and 90 billion then they will definately find fault with the ftt affecting clients!!
 
Quote from cstfx:

Actually, I think that if this proposal fails, the FTT may be back in the crosshairs.

That might be true but the FTT would definately cost the investor more than the proposed bank tax. Also the FTT could very easily be passed down as well. I think they would probably chose the lesser of two evils (the bank tax) if anything were to happen.

-Guru
 
HUNT: All right. Let me ask you about a couple tax issues even though you are not on the Ways and Means Committee.
Acting Chairman Levin yesterday said that he was going to soon take up the Obama proposal for a tax on big banks. The Congressional Budget Office says it’ll have very little effect on banks and would hurt consumers and investors. You’ve supported it in the past. Is this making you rethink your position?
FRANK: No, I haven’t seen that analysis. I don’t see how it would hurt consumers if it’s done right. And also, the way the president proposed it had a good regulatory impact because it was a tax on their liabilities. It would be a deterrent for them getting in over their heads.
Now you can debate about how to do it, and the way Ways and Means was thinking about changing it caused me some problems for institutions like mutual funds, insurance companies which I think were being somewhat unfairly hit. But I haven’t seen any suggestion that it’s going to hurt the consumers. It hurts investors by the way. Look, nobody guaranteed investors a free ride.
HUNT: Do you think it’ll get through the House?
FRANK: Yes, I think the notion that we cut community development block grants or we cut highway spending or environmental cleanup so that we avoid a tax on the banks, I don’t think that’s popular in the Senate.

http://www.businessweek.com/news/20...e-to-vote-on-consumer-agency-transcript-.html
 
Germany To Finalize Bank Levy Plan For Crisis Costs By April:

http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/stock-ma...lize-bank-levy-plan-for-crisis-costs-by-april

BERLIN -(Dow Jones)- By April, Germany will finalize a proposal on imposing a possible levy on banks to pay for costs caused by the financial crisis, which will form part of an international discussion, a German Finance Ministry spokesman said Monday.


Does anyone know if they are specifically referring to a Tobin Tax? It's interesting they mention the April timeframe (IMF report also do) and they also mention it will form part of an int'l discussion. Hopefully Germany is referring to some sort of direct levy on the banks and no longer a Tobin Tax.

-Guru
 
Quote from listedguru:

Germany To Finalize Bank Levy Plan For Crisis Costs By April:

http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/stock-ma...lize-bank-levy-plan-for-crisis-costs-by-april

BERLIN -(Dow Jones)- By April, Germany will finalize a proposal on imposing a possible levy on banks to pay for costs caused by the financial crisis, which will form part of an international discussion, a German Finance Ministry spokesman said Monday.


Does anyone know if they are specifically referring to a Tobin Tax? It's interesting they mention the April timeframe (IMF report also do) and they also mention it will form part of an int'l discussion. Hopefully Germany is referring to some sort of direct levy on the banks and no longer a Tobin Tax.

-Guru

Good question I am trying to find out becuase Germanyu has always downplayed the bank levy and been all for the ftt, but maybe they changed their mind.
 
Quote from rsikit:

Good question I am trying to find out becuase Germanyu has always downplayed the bank levy and been all for the ftt, but maybe they changed their mind.
I believe it is Merkel who is in favor of a FTT. However, she cannot push this through because it would require agreement from the other party that forms the coalition government with her own party. That party is anti-FTT.
 
Quote from TPCS:

I believe it is Merkel who is in favor of a FTT. However, she cannot push this through because it would require agreement from the other party that forms the coalition government with her own party. That party is anti-FTT.

Thanks TPCS good to know
 
Back
Top