1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today

The leaders’ original plan — to keep the chairmanship in Stark’s hands — met stiff resistance Wednesday from committee members who feel the unpredictable Californian is too great a liability to helm the powerful tax-writing panel.............
On Wednesday morning, Stark told Ways and Means Committee members that he would only assume the chairmanship on an interim basis and not seek to keep it beyond this year, sources familiar with that session said. Even that arrangement, however, sparked enough unease that the panel continued to huddle throughout the day to discuss its options.


http://www.rollcall.com/news/43828-1.html
 
Quote from listedguru:

I can't really find much on Levin other than he's also considered a liberal democrat but you have to believe he's the lesser of two evils.

-Guru



Guru,

I live in Michigan, and although Sander Levin is not in my district, he is pretty pro union, and has voted to increase taxes on various things over the many years he has served in Congress. One thing that may work in our favor is that he's not considered to be a Pelosi radical. His brother is U.S. Senator Carl Levin, also of Michigan.
I'm not really sure how the FTT would play out with Sander Levin, but I think he would be a much better choice for us to serve on the Ways and Means Committee than Stark. Another good thing is that I've never heard Levin mention anything about the FTT, however his voting record is pretty typical as far as liberals are concerned. He has voted against almost all tax cuts for capital gains, dividends, and small business, but again, I've never heard anything from him in regards to supporting the FTT.


Here are some links that show Sander Levin's voting record on various issues:



http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour...21B3XxWdqupJELrwQ&sig2=V59NIMeCQiP_Ih8bXgPYyA




http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour...vfh6caTx3HlYXkOqw&sig2=gBnzKBP69ycJ-AScu0EjWw
 
Of some concern is this except from the Reuters article:

"A liberal who reflects the pro-union tradition of his home state of Michigan, Levin, 78, has pushed for workers' rights in U.S. trade agreements. He has also favored increasing taxes on hedge fund and private equity managers, and vowed as chairman to help push the drive to revamp U.S. healthcare."
 
Quote from TraDaToR:Tired of my fellow Europeans
Unnecessarily so! "The European Commission said Thursday it will soon propose an EU-wide minimum tax on the use of automobile fuel, coal and natural gas — an idea it had until now resisted. EU spokeswoman Emer Traynor said a "carbon tax" was a "priority" issue for Algirdas Semeta, the new EU commissioner for taxation." [ http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100304/ap_on_bi_ge/eu_eu_carbon_tax ]

In fact, when we read the mission statement of the new Commissioner for Taxation, a long-standing (1992-7) Chairman of the Securities Commission of the Republic of Lithuania, we read that even though he believes that tax systems should "support environmental and social goals", at the same time must "reduce compliance costs" and "[remove tax obstacles when it comes to economic transactions in other Member States." (UK's Stamp Duty springs to mind, because 40% of its revenue comes from taxing non-UK residends). And indeed, the tax policy should be "green", "including a new approach to energy and CO2 taxation, in order to contribute to the important global efforts to address climate change". [source: http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/semeta/about/mandate/index_en.htm ]

With all due respect for those "social goals", Mr Semeta sounds like an improvement even over his already "sound" predecessor, Mr Covacs! A clearly pragmatic, rationally thinking (and writing) man - it is good to see that quants are back;) (Semeta graduated in 1985 from Vilnius University's Faculty of Economic Cybernetics and Finance with a degree as an economist-mathematician). So as long at he stays at the steering wheel (until 2014, but do ask his driver to check for brake fluid;), any emotional, non-evidence-based motives can be safely ruled out from the EU Commission's taxation policy (if they were ever a threat in an organization so far removed from electorate pressures).

Let's just hope that "innovative financing at a global level," mentioned by him in his first ECOFIN speech means precisely the same as above: the "carbon tax", and not something else. After all, he thinks that it is "essential to aim at the end of cross-border company tax problem such as double taxation, lack of cross border loss relief and onerous transfer pricing rules". So even though he speaks against "uncooperative jurisdictions, including tax havens, and against bank secrecy", at the same time rules out taxation which would hamper EU competitiveness, such as an unilaterally imposed EU-only FTT (previously floated by that "new Frenchmen" Commissioner for financial services, M. Barnier), because as Semeta puts it, "Europe needs to boost competitiveness and growth as a core priority".

So it looks like this man is the last one in the entire E.C. to come up with Tobin (1978) "sand in the wheels" ideas: "The proper functioning of the internal market therefore lies at the very heart of my priorities ... reducing red tape and administrative burdens ... reduction of compliance costs and the definition of clear, simple rules, both in the direct and indirect tax areas ... the end of cross-border company tax problem such as double taxation ... citizens should also be freed from the tax obstacles they still suffer in cross border situations "... I suppose a Tobin tax would qualify for one! [source: http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/semeta/headlines/speeches/2010/02/speech_1602b.pdf ]

Notice also that Mr. Semeta used to be Lithuania's Finance Minister (twice, from Dec 2008 to Jun 2009, and from Feb 1997 to Jun 1999), and the country "has established a rather attractive tax regime for share transfers", including total lack of any burdens on share transfers, not only transaction taxes ("Lithuania does not apply transfer taxes to the transfer of shares in Lithuanian companies."), but any other fees or levies or duties ("Since it is sufficient to execute the share transfer by a simple written agreement, parties to a transaction do not incur notary fees. Further, in terms of VAT, the share transfer is regarded as a VAT-exempt transaction.") [source: http://www.sorainen.com/file.php?17332 ]

Given the above prediction, now use the trusted "reverse method" and conclude that it will be M. Barnier (the pro-Tobin Frenchman responsible for [destroying the] financial services, with whom Semeta is forced to cooperate), who will prevail in the end, and the EU will scrap what can indeed work, i.e. the carbon tax, in favor of what wins votes in a recession for some neosocialists, embarking on an unilateral socioeconomic experiment which already failed in many countries such as Sweden... In an uncertain world, that guess is just as good as the previous, rational one;) Even black swans can sometimes go red... ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_..._Ten_Principles_for_a_Black_Swan_Robust_World ).
 
European Union budget rules are applied adequately says ECB's Governing Council member Vitor Constancio.

http://www.iii.co.uk/news/?type=afxnews&articleid=7778481&subject=economic&action=article

[...] Constancio appeared cool to the idea of a international tax on financial transactions as a tool to prevent future financial market crises.
He said such a levy would be immediately passed on to banks' customers via increased fees and that there were better ways of making sure banks did not take excessive risks.
 
CBO Warns Obama's Proposed Bank Fee Could End Up Costing Consumers:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalp...-bank-fee-could-end-up-costing-consumers.html

"President Obama's proposed fee on the country's biggest banks receiving taxpayer bailout money would ultimately result in costs to the firms' customers, employees, and investors, a non-partisan Congressional watchdog said today."

"But the Congressional Budget Office today warned that "the ultimate cost of a tax or fee is not necessarily borne by the entity that writes the check to the government."

"The cost of the proposed fee would ultimately be borne to varying degrees by an institution's customers, employees, and investors," the CBO said today in a letter to Sen. Chuck Grassley.

-Guru
 
Back
Top